GeForce FX 5200LE vs GeForce4 440 Go 64M

NVIDIA

GeForce FX 5200LE

2025Core: 2017 MHzBoost: 2407 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce4 440 Go 64M

2012Core: Up to 710 MHz
Similar parts
······

GeForce FX 5200LE vs GeForce4 440 Go 64M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce FX 5200LE vs GeForce4 440 Go 64M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce FX 5200LE vs GeForce4 440 Go 64M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce FX 5200LE

2025

Why buy it

  • +16.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($43 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Better long-term bet: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 1696.9% higher power demand at 575W vs 32W.

GeForce4 440 Go 64M

2012

Why buy it

  • Draws 32W instead of 575W, a 543W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (6 vs 7).
  • 2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $43 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce FX 5200LE is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 16.7% in PassMark G3D (7 vs 6), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce FX 5200LE is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 5nm process instead of 28nm, 170 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2012. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce FX 5200LE makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce FX 5200LE vs GeForce4 440 Go 64M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce FX 5200LE

The GeForce FX 5200LE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 30 2025. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock ranges from 2017 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 21760 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 575W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 170 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7 points. Launch price was $1,999.

NVIDIA

GeForce4 440 Go 64M

The GeForce4 440 Go 64M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is Up to 710 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 32W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX 5200LE scores 7 versus the GeForce4 440 Go 64M's 6 — the GeForce FX 5200LE leads by 16.7%. The GeForce FX 5200LE is built on Rankine while the GeForce4 440 Go 64M uses Kepler, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 21,760 (GeForce FX 5200LE) vs 384 (GeForce4 440 Go 64M). Raw compute: 104.8 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5200LE) vs 0.5445 TFLOPS (GeForce4 440 Go 64M).

FeatureGeForce FX 5200LEGeForce4 440 Go 64M
G3D Mark Score
7+17%
6
Architecture
Rankine
Kepler
Process Node
5 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
21760+5567%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
104.8 TFLOPS+19147%
0.5445 TFLOPS
ROPs
176+1000%
16
TMUs
680+2025%
32
L1 Cache
21.3 MB+70900%
0.03 MB
L2 Cache
96 MB+38300%
0.25 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce FX 5200LEGeForce4 440 Go 64M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce FX 5200LE and 64-bit on the GeForce4 440 Go 64M. L2 Cache: 96 MB (GeForce FX 5200LE) vs 0.25 MB (GeForce4 440 Go 64M) — the GeForce FX 5200LE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce FX 5200LEGeForce4 440 Go 64M
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
96 MB+38300%
0.25 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX 5200LE) vs 7.0 (GeForce4 440 Go 64M). Vulkan: None vs N/A. OpenGL: 1.5 vs 1.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce FX 5200LEGeForce4 440 Go 64M
DirectX
9.0a+29%
7.0
Vulkan
None
N/A
OpenGL
1.5
1.5
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce FX 5200LE) vs None (GeForce4 440 Go 64M). Decoder: No vs MPEG-2 VPE. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce FX 5200LE) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce4 440 Go 64M).

FeatureGeForce FX 5200LEGeForce4 440 Go 64M
Encoder
No
None
Decoder
No
MPEG-2 VPE
Codecs
MPEG-2
MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce FX 5200LE draws 575W versus the GeForce4 440 Go 64M's 32W — a 178.9% difference. The GeForce4 440 Go 64M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5200LE) vs 350W (GeForce4 440 Go 64M). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 85.

FeatureGeForce FX 5200LEGeForce4 440 Go 64M
TDP
575W
32W-94%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
168mm
0mm
Height
111mm
0mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
65°C-24%
85
Perf/Watt
0.0
0.2
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce FX 5200LE (2025 vs 2012).

FeatureGeForce FX 5200LEGeForce4 440 Go 64M
MSRP
$43
Codename
GB202
GK107
Release
January 30 2025
October 1 2012
Ranking
#3
#903

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.