GeForce FX 5200LE vs GeForce FX Go 5200

NVIDIA

GeForce FX 5200LE

2025Core: 2017 MHzBoost: 2407 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce FX Go 5200

2025Core: 2017 MHzBoost: 2407 MHz

GeForce FX 5200LE vs GeForce FX Go 5200 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce FX 5200LE vs GeForce FX Go 5200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce FX 5200LE vs GeForce FX Go 5200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce FX 5200LE

2025

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($43 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 1512.9% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 32 MB).
  • More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (7 vs 8).

GeForce FX Go 5200

2025

Why buy it

  • +14.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 32 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $43 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce FX Go 5200 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 14.3% in PassMark G3D (8 vs 7), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce FX 5200LE is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs 32 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce FX 5200LE makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. GeForce FX Go 5200 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce FX 5200LE vs GeForce FX Go 5200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce FX 5200LE

The GeForce FX 5200LE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 30 2025. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock ranges from 2017 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 21760 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 575W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 170 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7 points. Launch price was $1,999.

NVIDIA

GeForce FX Go 5200

The GeForce FX Go 5200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 30 2025. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock ranges from 2017 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 21760 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 575W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 170 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8 points. Launch price was $1,999.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX 5200LE scores 7 versus the GeForce FX Go 5200's 8 — the GeForce FX Go 5200 leads by 14.3%. The GeForce FX 5200LE is built on Rankine while the GeForce FX Go 5200 uses Rankine, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 21,760 (GeForce FX 5200LE) vs 21,760 (GeForce FX Go 5200). Raw compute: 104.8 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5200LE) vs 104.8 TFLOPS (GeForce FX Go 5200). Boost clocks: 2407 MHz vs 2407 MHz. Ray tracing: 170 RT cores (GeForce FX 5200LE) vs 170 (GeForce FX Go 5200) with 680 Tensor cores vs 680.

FeatureGeForce FX 5200LEGeForce FX Go 5200
G3D Mark Score
7
8+14%
Architecture
Rankine
Rankine
Process Node
5 nm
5 nm
Shading Units
21760
21760
Compute (TFLOPS)
104.8 TFLOPS
104.8 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2407 MHz
2407 MHz
ROPs
176
176
TMUs
680
680
L1 Cache
21.3 MB
21.3 MB
L2 Cache
96 MB
96 MB
Ray Tracing Cores
170
170
Tensor Cores
680
680

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce FX 5200LEGeForce FX Go 5200
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce FX 5200LE has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce FX Go 5200 carries 32 MB. GeForce FX 5200LE gives you 1512.9% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce FX 5200LE and 128-bit on the GeForce FX Go 5200.

FeatureGeForce FX 5200LEGeForce FX Go 5200
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB+1513%
0.031 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
96 MB
96 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX 5200LE) vs 9.0a (GeForce FX Go 5200). Vulkan: None vs None. OpenGL: 1.5 vs 1.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce FX 5200LEGeForce FX Go 5200
DirectX
9.0a
9.0a
Vulkan
None
None
OpenGL
1.5
1.5
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce FX 5200LE) vs No (GeForce FX Go 5200). Decoder: No vs No. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce FX 5200LE) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce FX Go 5200).

FeatureGeForce FX 5200LEGeForce FX Go 5200
Encoder
No
No
Decoder
No
No
Codecs
MPEG-2
MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce FX 5200LE draws 575W versus the GeForce FX Go 5200's 575W — a 0% difference. The GeForce FX Go 5200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5200LE) vs 350W (GeForce FX Go 5200). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 168mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 75°C.

FeatureGeForce FX 5200LEGeForce FX Go 5200
TDP
575W
575W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
Legacy
Length
168mm
0mm
Height
111mm
0mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
65°C-13%
75°C
Perf/Watt
0.0
0.0