GeForce FX 5200LE vs GeForce4 Ti 4200

NVIDIA

GeForce FX 5200LE

2025Core: 2017 MHzBoost: 2407 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce4 Ti 4200

2022Core: 2235 MHzBoost: 2520 MHz
Similar parts
······

GeForce FX 5200LE vs GeForce4 Ti 4200 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce FX 5200LE vs GeForce4 Ti 4200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce FX 5200LE vs GeForce4 Ti 4200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce FX 5200LE

2025

Why buy it

  • +16.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • Costs $156 less on MSRP ($43 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
  • Delivers 439.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.2 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($43 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
  • 32.8% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (680 vs 512).
  • Better long-term bet: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 27.8% higher power demand at 575W vs 450W.

GeForce4 Ti 4200

2022

Why buy it

  • Draws 450W instead of 575W, a 125W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (6 vs 7).
  • Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (512 vs 680), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
  • GeForce FX 5200LE is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
  • 362.8% HIGHER MSRP
    $199 MSRPvs$43 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 0.2 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $43 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce FX 5200LE is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 16.7% in PassMark G3D (7 vs 6), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce FX 5200LE is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 170 vs 128 ray-tracing units and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2022. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce FX 5200LE makes the most sense to buy today. It is $156 cheaper on MSRP at $43 vs $199, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 439.9% (0.2 vs 0.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce FX 5200LE vs GeForce4 Ti 4200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce FX 5200LE

The GeForce FX 5200LE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 30 2025. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock ranges from 2017 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 21760 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 575W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 170 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7 points. Launch price was $1,999.

NVIDIA

GeForce4 Ti 4200

The GeForce4 Ti 4200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2022. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2235 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 16384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 450W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 128 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6 points. Launch price was $1,599.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX 5200LE scores 7 versus the GeForce4 Ti 4200's 6 — the GeForce FX 5200LE leads by 16.7%. The GeForce FX 5200LE is built on Rankine while the GeForce4 Ti 4200 uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 21,760 (GeForce FX 5200LE) vs 16,384 (GeForce4 Ti 4200). Raw compute: 104.8 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5200LE) vs 82.58 TFLOPS (GeForce4 Ti 4200). Boost clocks: 2407 MHz vs 2520 MHz. Ray tracing: 170 RT cores (GeForce FX 5200LE) vs 128 (GeForce4 Ti 4200) with 680 Tensor cores vs 512.

FeatureGeForce FX 5200LEGeForce4 Ti 4200
G3D Mark Score
7+17%
6
Architecture
Rankine
Ada Lovelace
Process Node
5 nm
5 nm
Shading Units
21760+33%
16384
Compute (TFLOPS)
104.8 TFLOPS+27%
82.58 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2407 MHz
2520 MHz+5%
ROPs
176
176
TMUs
680+33%
512
L1 Cache
21.3 MB+33%
16 MB
L2 Cache
96 MB+33%
72 MB
Ray Tracing Cores
170+33%
128
Tensor Cores
680+33%
512

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce FX 5200LEGeForce4 Ti 4200
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce FX 5200LE and 64-bit on the GeForce4 Ti 4200. L2 Cache: 96 MB (GeForce FX 5200LE) vs 72 MB (GeForce4 Ti 4200) — the GeForce FX 5200LE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce FX 5200LEGeForce4 Ti 4200
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
96 MB+33%
72 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX 5200LE) vs 8.1 (GeForce4 Ti 4200). Vulkan: None vs N/A. OpenGL: 1.5 vs 1.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce FX 5200LEGeForce4 Ti 4200
DirectX
9.0a+11%
8.1
Vulkan
None
N/A
OpenGL
1.5
1.5
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce FX 5200LE) vs None (GeForce4 Ti 4200). Decoder: No vs None. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce FX 5200LE) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce4 Ti 4200).

FeatureGeForce FX 5200LEGeForce4 Ti 4200
Encoder
No
None
Decoder
No
None
Codecs
MPEG-2
MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce FX 5200LE draws 575W versus the GeForce4 Ti 4200's 450W — a 24.4% difference. The GeForce4 Ti 4200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5200LE) vs 350W (GeForce4 Ti 4200). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 175mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 65.

FeatureGeForce FX 5200LEGeForce4 Ti 4200
TDP
575W
450W-22%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
168mm
175mm
Height
111mm
100mm
Slots
1
1
Temp (Load)
65°C
65
Perf/Watt
0.0
0.0
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce FX 5200LE came in at $43, while the GeForce4 Ti 4200 launched at $199. On MSRP, GeForce FX 5200LE was 78.4% cheaper ($156 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.2 (GeForce FX 5200LE) vs 0.0 (GeForce4 Ti 4200) — the GeForce FX 5200LE offers 100+% better value. The newer card here is GeForce FX 5200LE (2025 vs 2022).

FeatureGeForce FX 5200LEGeForce4 Ti 4200
MSRP
$43-78%
$199
Performance per Dollar
0.2
0.0
Codename
GB202
AD102
Release
January 30 2025
September 20 2022
Ranking
#3
#4

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.