
GeForce FX 5200LE

Quadro FX 500/FX 600
GeForce FX 5200LE vs Quadro FX 500/FX 600 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce FX 5200LE vs Quadro FX 500/FX 600 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce FX 5200LE vs Quadro FX 500/FX 600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce FX 5200LE
2025Why buy it
- β Costs $406 less on MSRP ($43 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- β Delivers 813.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.2 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($43 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- β Better long-term bet: Blackwell 2.0 (2025β2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark G3D performance (7 vs 8).
- βLess VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- β204.2% higher power demand at 575W vs 189W.
Quadro FX 500/FX 600
2008Why buy it
- β +14.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- β 700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
- β Draws 189W instead of 575W, a 386W reduction.
Trade-offs
- β2008 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- β944.2% HIGHER MSRP$449 MSRPvs$43 MSRP
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 0.2 G3D/$ ($449 MSRP vs $43 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce FX 5200LE vs Quadro FX 500/FX 600 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce FX 5200LE
The GeForce FX 5200LE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 30 2025. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock ranges from 2017 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 21760 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 575W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 170 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7 points. Launch price was $1,999.

Quadro FX 500/FX 600
The Quadro FX 500/FX 600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX 5200LE scores 7 versus the Quadro FX 500/FX 600's 8 β the Quadro FX 500/FX 600 leads by 14.3%. The GeForce FX 5200LE is built on Rankine while the Quadro FX 500/FX 600 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 21,760 (GeForce FX 5200LE) vs 240 (Quadro FX 500/FX 600). Raw compute: 104.8 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5200LE) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 500/FX 600).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5200LE | Quadro FX 500/FX 600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7 | 8+14% |
| Architecture | Rankine | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 21760+8967% | 240 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 104.8 TFLOPS+16746% | 0.6221 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 176+450% | 32 |
| TMUs | 680+750% | 80 |
| L2 Cache | 96 MB+38300% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce FX 5200LE gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 500/FX 600 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5200LE | Quadro FX 500/FX 600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce FX 5200LE has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 500/FX 600 carries 4 GB. Quadro FX 500/FX 600 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce FX 5200LE and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 500/FX 600. L2 Cache: 96 MB (GeForce FX 5200LE) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 500/FX 600) β the GeForce FX 5200LE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5200LE | Quadro FX 500/FX 600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 4 GB+700% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 96 MB+38300% | 0.25 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce FX 5200LE draws 575W versus the Quadro FX 500/FX 600's 189W β a 101% difference. The Quadro FX 500/FX 600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5200LE) vs 350W (Quadro FX 500/FX 600). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5200LE | Quadro FX 500/FX 600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 575W | 189W-67% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | β |
| Height | 111mm | β |
| Slots | 1 | β |
| Temp (Load) | 65Β°C | β |
| Perf/Watt | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce FX 5200LE came in at $43, while the Quadro FX 500/FX 600 launched at $449. On MSRP, GeForce FX 5200LE was 90.4% cheaper ($406 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.2 (GeForce FX 5200LE) vs 0.0 (Quadro FX 500/FX 600) β the GeForce FX 5200LE offers 100+% better value. The newer card here is GeForce FX 5200LE (2025 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5200LE | Quadro FX 500/FX 600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $43-90% | $449 |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.2 | 0.0 |
| Codename | GB202 | GT200B |
| Release | January 30 2025 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #3 | #815 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














