
GeForce4 440

GeForce4 Ti 4800
GeForce4 440 vs GeForce4 Ti 4800 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce4 440 vs GeForce4 Ti 4800 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce4 440 vs GeForce4 Ti 4800: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce4 440
2015Why buy it
- ✅Draws 33W instead of 250W, a 217W reduction.
- ✅Measures 170mm instead of 216mm, a 46mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5 vs 6).
- ❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌17.5% HIGHER MSRP$469 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($469 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce4 Ti 4800
2010Why buy it
- ✅+20% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $70 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $469 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 41.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $469 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌657.6% higher power demand at 250W vs 33W.
- ❌27.1% longer card at 216mm vs 170mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce4 440 vs GeForce4 Ti 4800 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce4 440
The GeForce4 440 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1072 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.

GeForce4 Ti 4800
The GeForce4 Ti 4800 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 26 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce4 440 scores 5 versus the GeForce4 Ti 4800's 6 — the GeForce4 Ti 4800 leads by 20%. The GeForce4 440 is built on Maxwell while the GeForce4 Ti 4800 uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce4 440) vs 480 (GeForce4 Ti 4800). Raw compute: 0.9032 TFLOPS (GeForce4 440) vs 1.345 TFLOPS (GeForce4 Ti 4800).
| Feature | GeForce4 440 | GeForce4 Ti 4800 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5 | 6+20% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 480+25% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.9032 TFLOPS | 1.345 TFLOPS+49% |
| ROPs | 8 | 48+500% |
| TMUs | 24 | 60+150% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 960 KB+400% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+33% | 0.75 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce4 440 | GeForce4 Ti 4800 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce4 440 and 64-bit on the GeForce4 Ti 4800. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce4 440) vs 0.75 MB (GeForce4 Ti 4800) — the GeForce4 440 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce4 440 | GeForce4 Ti 4800 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+33% | 0.75 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 7.0 (GeForce4 440) vs 8.1 (GeForce4 Ti 4800). Vulkan: N/A vs None. OpenGL: 1.5 vs 1.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce4 440 | GeForce4 Ti 4800 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 7.0 | 8.1+16% |
| Vulkan | N/A | None |
| OpenGL | 1.5+15% | 1.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce4 440) vs No (GeForce4 Ti 4800). Decoder: None vs No.
| Feature | GeForce4 440 | GeForce4 Ti 4800 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | No |
| Decoder | None | No |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce4 440 draws 33W versus the GeForce4 Ti 4800's 250W — a 153.4% difference. The GeForce4 440 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce4 440) vs 350W (GeForce4 Ti 4800). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 170mm vs 216mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70 vs 65°C.
| Feature | GeForce4 440 | GeForce4 Ti 4800 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-87% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 170mm | 216mm |
| Height | 100mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 70 | 65°C-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 0.2 | 0.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce4 440 came in at $469, while the GeForce4 Ti 4800 launched at $399. On MSRP, GeForce4 Ti 4800 was 14.9% cheaper ($70 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.0 (GeForce4 440) vs 0.0 (GeForce4 Ti 4800) — the GeForce4 Ti 4800 offers 0% better value. The newer card here is GeForce4 440 (2015 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce4 440 | GeForce4 Ti 4800 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $469 | $399-15% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Codename | GM108 | GF100 |
| Release | March 13 2015 | March 26 2010 |
| Ranking | #847 | #488 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














