
GeForce4 440

GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
GeForce4 440 vs GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce4 440 vs GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce4 440 vs GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce4 440
2015Why buy it
- ✅Draws 33W instead of 150W, a 117W reduction.
- ✅Measures 170mm instead of 216mm, a 46mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5 vs 7).
- ❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌56.9% HIGHER MSRP$469 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($469 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
2010Why buy it
- ✅+40% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $170 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $469 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 119.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $469 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌354.5% higher power demand at 150W vs 33W.
- ❌27.1% longer card at 216mm vs 170mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce4 440 vs GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce4 440
The GeForce4 440 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1072 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.

GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
The GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 15 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 650 MHz. It has 288 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7 points. Launch price was $160.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce4 440 scores 5 versus the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE's 7 — the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE leads by 40%. The GeForce4 440 is built on Maxwell while the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce4 440) vs 288 (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE). Raw compute: 0.9032 TFLOPS (GeForce4 440) vs 0.7488 TFLOPS (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE).
| Feature | GeForce4 440 | GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5 | 7+40% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+33% | 288 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.9032 TFLOPS+21% | 0.7488 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8 | 32+300% |
| TMUs | 24 | 48+100% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 384 KB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce4 440 | GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce4 440 and 64-bit on the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce4 440) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE) — the GeForce4 440 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce4 440 | GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 7.0 (GeForce4 440) vs 8.1 (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE). Vulkan: N/A vs None. OpenGL: 1.5 vs 1.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce4 440 | GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 7.0 | 8.1+16% |
| Vulkan | N/A | None |
| OpenGL | 1.5+15% | 1.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce4 440) vs No (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE). Decoder: None vs No.
| Feature | GeForce4 440 | GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | No |
| Decoder | None | No |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce4 440 draws 33W versus the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE's 150W — a 127.9% difference. The GeForce4 440 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce4 440) vs 350W (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 170mm vs 216mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70 vs 65°C.
| Feature | GeForce4 440 | GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-78% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 170mm | 216mm |
| Height | 100mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 70 | 65°C-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 0.2 | 0.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce4 440 came in at $469, while the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE launched at $299. On MSRP, GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE was 36.2% cheaper ($170 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.0 (GeForce4 440) vs 0.0 (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE) — the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE offers 0% better value. The newer card here is GeForce4 440 (2015 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce4 440 | GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $469 | $299-36% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Codename | GM108 | GF104 |
| Release | March 13 2015 | November 15 2010 |
| Ranking | #847 | #683 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














