
GeForce4 440

GeForce4 Ti 4200
GeForce4 440 vs GeForce4 Ti 4200 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce4 440 vs GeForce4 Ti 4200 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce4 440 vs GeForce4 Ti 4200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce4 440
2015Why buy it
- ✅Draws 33W instead of 450W, a 417W reduction.
- ✅Measures 170mm instead of 175mm, a 5mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5 vs 6).
- ❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌135.7% HIGHER MSRP$469 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($469 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
GeForce4 Ti 4200
2022Why buy it
- ✅+20% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $270 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $469 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 182.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $469 MSRP).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌1263.6% higher power demand at 450W vs 33W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce4 440 vs GeForce4 Ti 4200 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce4 440
The GeForce4 440 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1072 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.

GeForce4 Ti 4200
The GeForce4 Ti 4200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2022. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2235 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 16384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 450W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 128 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6 points. Launch price was $1,599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce4 440 scores 5 versus the GeForce4 Ti 4200's 6 — the GeForce4 Ti 4200 leads by 20%. The GeForce4 440 is built on Maxwell while the GeForce4 Ti 4200 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce4 440) vs 16,384 (GeForce4 Ti 4200). Raw compute: 0.9032 TFLOPS (GeForce4 440) vs 82.58 TFLOPS (GeForce4 Ti 4200). Boost clocks: 1176 MHz vs 2520 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce4 440 | GeForce4 Ti 4200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5 | 6+20% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 16384+4167% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.9032 TFLOPS | 82.58 TFLOPS+9043% |
| Boost Clock | 1176 MHz | 2520 MHz+114% |
| ROPs | 8 | 176+2100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 512+2033% |
| L1 Cache | 0.19 MB | 16 MB+8321% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 72 MB+7100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce4 440 | GeForce4 Ti 4200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce4 440 and 64-bit on the GeForce4 Ti 4200. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce4 440) vs 72 MB (GeForce4 Ti 4200) — the GeForce4 Ti 4200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce4 440 | GeForce4 Ti 4200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 72 MB+7100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 7.0 (GeForce4 440) vs 8.1 (GeForce4 Ti 4200). Vulkan: N/A vs N/A. OpenGL: 1.5 vs 1.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce4 440 | GeForce4 Ti 4200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 7.0 | 8.1+16% |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| OpenGL | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce4 440) vs None (GeForce4 Ti 4200). Decoder: None vs None. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce4 440) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce4 Ti 4200).
| Feature | GeForce4 440 | GeForce4 Ti 4200 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | None |
| Decoder | None | None |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce4 440 draws 33W versus the GeForce4 Ti 4200's 450W — a 172.7% difference. The GeForce4 440 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce4 440) vs 350W (GeForce4 Ti 4200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 170mm vs 175mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70 vs 65.
| Feature | GeForce4 440 | GeForce4 Ti 4200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-93% | 450W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 170mm | 175mm |
| Height | 100mm | 100mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 70 | 65-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 0.2 | 0.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce4 440 came in at $469, while the GeForce4 Ti 4200 launched at $199. On MSRP, GeForce4 Ti 4200 was 57.6% cheaper ($270 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.0 (GeForce4 440) vs 0.0 (GeForce4 Ti 4200) — the GeForce4 Ti 4200 offers 0% better value. The newer card here is GeForce4 Ti 4200 (2022 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce4 440 | GeForce4 Ti 4200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $469 | $199-58% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Codename | GM108 | AD102 |
| Release | March 13 2015 | September 20 2022 |
| Ranking | #847 | #4 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














