
GeForce4 Ti 4400

GeForce4 Ti 4800
GeForce4 Ti 4400 vs GeForce4 Ti 4800 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce4 Ti 4400 vs GeForce4 Ti 4800 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Warzone
GeForce4 Ti 4400 vs GeForce4 Ti 4800: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce4 Ti 4400
2022Why buy it
- ✅+16.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 55.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌80% higher power demand at 450W vs 250W.
GeForce4 Ti 4800
2010Why buy it
- ✅Draws 250W instead of 450W, a 200W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6 vs 7).
- ❌2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌33.4% HIGHER MSRP$399 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce4 Ti 4400 vs GeForce4 Ti 4800 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce4 Ti 4400
The GeForce4 Ti 4400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2022. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2235 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 16384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 450W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 128 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7 points. Launch price was $1,599.

GeForce4 Ti 4800
The GeForce4 Ti 4800 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 26 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce4 Ti 4400 scores 7 versus the GeForce4 Ti 4800's 6 — the GeForce4 Ti 4400 leads by 16.7%. The GeForce4 Ti 4400 is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce4 Ti 4800 uses Fermi, both on 5 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 16,384 (GeForce4 Ti 4400) vs 480 (GeForce4 Ti 4800). Raw compute: 82.58 TFLOPS (GeForce4 Ti 4400) vs 1.345 TFLOPS (GeForce4 Ti 4800).
| Feature | GeForce4 Ti 4400 | GeForce4 Ti 4800 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7+17% | 6 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Fermi |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 16384+3313% | 480 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 82.58 TFLOPS+6040% | 1.345 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 176+267% | 48 |
| TMUs | 512+753% | 60 |
| L1 Cache | 16 MB+1602% | 0.94 MB |
| L2 Cache | 72 MB+9500% | 0.75 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce4 Ti 4400 | GeForce4 Ti 4800 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce4 Ti 4400 and 64-bit on the GeForce4 Ti 4800. L2 Cache: 72 MB (GeForce4 Ti 4400) vs 0.75 MB (GeForce4 Ti 4800) — the GeForce4 Ti 4400 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce4 Ti 4400 | GeForce4 Ti 4800 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 72 MB+9500% | 0.75 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 8.1 (GeForce4 Ti 4400) vs 8.1 (GeForce4 Ti 4800). OpenGL: 1.3 vs 1.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce4 Ti 4400 | GeForce4 Ti 4800 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 8.1 | 8.1 |
| OpenGL | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce4 Ti 4400) vs No (GeForce4 Ti 4800). Decoder: MPEG-2 Decoder vs No.
| Feature | GeForce4 Ti 4400 | GeForce4 Ti 4800 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | No |
| Decoder | MPEG-2 Decoder | No |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce4 Ti 4400 draws 450W versus the GeForce4 Ti 4800's 250W — a 57.1% difference. The GeForce4 Ti 4800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce4 Ti 4400) vs 350W (GeForce4 Ti 4800). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 216mm vs 216mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 65°C.
| Feature | GeForce4 Ti 4400 | GeForce4 Ti 4800 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 450W | 250W-44% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 216mm | 216mm |
| Height | 100mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C | 65°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce4 Ti 4400 came in at $299, while the GeForce4 Ti 4800 launched at $399. On MSRP, GeForce4 Ti 4400 was 25.1% cheaper ($100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.0 (GeForce4 Ti 4400) vs 0.0 (GeForce4 Ti 4800) — the GeForce4 Ti 4800 offers 0% better value. The newer card here is GeForce4 Ti 4400 (2022 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce4 Ti 4400 | GeForce4 Ti 4800 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299-25% | $399 |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Codename | AD102 | GF100 |
| Release | September 20 2022 | March 26 2010 |
| Ranking | #4 | #488 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














