
GeForce PCX 5300

GeForce4 Ti 4400
GeForce PCX 5300 vs GeForce4 Ti 4400 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce PCX 5300 vs GeForce4 Ti 4400 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce PCX 5300 vs GeForce4 Ti 4400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce PCX 5300
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $239 less on MSRP ($60 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 327.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.1 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($60 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅32.8% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (680 vs 512).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 216mm, a 48mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6 vs 7).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌27.8% higher power demand at 575W vs 450W.
GeForce4 Ti 4400
2022Why buy it
- ✅+16.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 128 MB).
- ✅Draws 450W instead of 575W, a 125W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (512 vs 680), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌GeForce PCX 5300 is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌398.3% HIGHER MSRP$299 MSRPvs$60 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 0.1 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
- ❌28.6% longer card at 216mm vs 168mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce PCX 5300 vs GeForce4 Ti 4400 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce PCX 5300
The GeForce PCX 5300 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 30 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2017 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 21760 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 575W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 170 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6 points. Launch price was $1,999.

GeForce4 Ti 4400
The GeForce4 Ti 4400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2022. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2235 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 16384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 450W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 128 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7 points. Launch price was $1,599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce PCX 5300 scores 6 versus the GeForce4 Ti 4400's 7 — the GeForce4 Ti 4400 leads by 16.7%. The GeForce PCX 5300 is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the GeForce4 Ti 4400 uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 21,760 (GeForce PCX 5300) vs 16,384 (GeForce4 Ti 4400). Raw compute: 104.8 TFLOPS (GeForce PCX 5300) vs 82.58 TFLOPS (GeForce4 Ti 4400). Boost clocks: 2407 MHz vs 2520 MHz. Ray tracing: 170 RT cores (GeForce PCX 5300) vs 128 (GeForce4 Ti 4400) with 680 Tensor cores vs 512.
| Feature | GeForce PCX 5300 | GeForce4 Ti 4400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6 | 7+17% |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 21760+33% | 16384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 104.8 TFLOPS+27% | 82.58 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2407 MHz | 2520 MHz+5% |
| ROPs | 176 | 176 |
| TMUs | 680+33% | 512 |
| L1 Cache | 21.3 MB+33% | 16 MB |
| L2 Cache | 96 MB+33% | 72 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 170+33% | 128 |
| Tensor Cores | 680+33% | 512 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce PCX 5300 | GeForce4 Ti 4400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce PCX 5300 has 128 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce4 Ti 4400 carries 512 MB. GeForce4 Ti 4400 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce PCX 5300 and 64-bit on the GeForce4 Ti 4400. L2 Cache: 96 MB (GeForce PCX 5300) vs 72 MB (GeForce4 Ti 4400) — the GeForce PCX 5300 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce PCX 5300 | GeForce4 Ti 4400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 0.5 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 96 MB+33% | 72 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce PCX 5300) vs 8.1 (GeForce4 Ti 4400). OpenGL: 1.5 vs 1.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce PCX 5300 | GeForce4 Ti 4400 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0a+11% | 8.1 |
| OpenGL | 1.5+15% | 1.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce PCX 5300) vs None (GeForce4 Ti 4400). Decoder: None vs MPEG-2 Decoder.
| Feature | GeForce PCX 5300 | GeForce4 Ti 4400 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | None |
| Decoder | None | MPEG-2 Decoder |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce PCX 5300 draws 575W versus the GeForce4 Ti 4400's 450W — a 24.4% difference. The GeForce4 Ti 4400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce PCX 5300) vs 350W (GeForce4 Ti 4400). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 216mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70 vs 65°C.
| Feature | GeForce PCX 5300 | GeForce4 Ti 4400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 575W | 450W-22% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | 216mm |
| Height | 100mm | 100mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 70 | 65°C-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce PCX 5300 came in at $60, while the GeForce4 Ti 4400 launched at $299. On MSRP, GeForce PCX 5300 was 79.9% cheaper ($239 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.1 (GeForce PCX 5300) vs 0.0 (GeForce4 Ti 4400) — the GeForce PCX 5300 offers 100+% better value. The newer card here is GeForce PCX 5300 (2025 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce PCX 5300 | GeForce4 Ti 4400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $60-80% | $299 |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.1 | 0.0 |
| Codename | GB202 | AD102 |
| Release | January 30 2025 | September 20 2022 |
| Ranking | #3 | #4 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













