
GeForce FX 5200 vs GeForce PCX 5300

GeForce FX 5200
Popular choices:

GeForce PCX 5300
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce FX 5200 is positioned at rank 374 and the GeForce PCX 5300 is on rank 376, so the GeForce FX 5200 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce FX 5200
Performance Per Dollar GeForce PCX 5300
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce FX 5200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 33.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce PCX 5300.
| Insight | GeForce FX 5200 | GeForce PCX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+33.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-33.3%) |
| Longevity | Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) (5nm) | Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) (5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce PCX 5300 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $15 versus $25 for the GeForce FX 5200, it costs 40% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 25% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce FX 5200 | GeForce PCX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+25%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($25) | ✅More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce FX 5200 and GeForce PCX 5300

GeForce FX 5200
The GeForce FX 5200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 30 2025. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock ranges from 2017 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 21760 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 575W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 170 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8 points. Launch price was $1,999.

GeForce PCX 5300
The GeForce PCX 5300 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 30 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2017 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 21760 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 575W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 170 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6 points. Launch price was $1,999.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX 5200 scores 8 versus the GeForce PCX 5300's 6 — the GeForce FX 5200 leads by 33.3%. The GeForce FX 5200 is built on Rankine while the GeForce PCX 5300 uses Blackwell 2.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 21,760 (GeForce FX 5200) vs 21,760 (GeForce PCX 5300). Raw compute: 104.8 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5200) vs 104.8 TFLOPS (GeForce PCX 5300). Boost clocks: 2407 MHz vs 2407 MHz. Ray tracing: 170 RT cores (GeForce FX 5200) vs 170 (GeForce PCX 5300) with 680 Tensor cores vs 680.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5200 | GeForce PCX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8+33% | 6 |
| Architecture | Rankine | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 21760 | 21760 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 104.8 TFLOPS | 104.8 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2407 MHz | 2407 MHz |
| ROPs | 176 | 176 |
| TMUs | 680 | 680 |
| L1 Cache | 21.3 MB | 21.3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 96 MB | 96 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 170 | 170 |
| Tensor Cores | 680 | 680 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce FX 5200 | GeForce PCX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 128 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5200 | GeForce PCX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 0.125 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 96 MB | 96 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX 5200) vs 9.0a (GeForce PCX 5300). Vulkan: N/A vs None. OpenGL: 1.5 vs 1.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5200 | GeForce PCX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0a | 9.0a |
| Vulkan | N/A | None |
| OpenGL | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce FX 5200) vs None (GeForce PCX 5300). Decoder: MPEG-2 Motion Compensation vs None.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5200 | GeForce PCX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | None |
| Decoder | MPEG-2 Motion Compensation | None |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce FX 5200 draws 575W versus the GeForce PCX 5300's 575W — a 0% difference. The GeForce PCX 5300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5200) vs 350W (GeForce PCX 5300). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 152mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70 vs 70.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5200 | GeForce PCX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 575W | 575W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 152mm | 168mm |
| Height | 100mm | 100mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 70 | 70 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce FX 5200 launched at $70 MSRP and currently averages $25, while the GeForce PCX 5300 launched at $60 and now averages $15. The GeForce PCX 5300 costs 40% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.3 (GeForce FX 5200) vs 0.4 (GeForce PCX 5300) — the GeForce PCX 5300 offers 33.3% better value.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5200 | GeForce PCX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $70 | $60-14% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $25 | $15-40% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.3 | 0.4+33% |
| Codename | GB202 | GB202 |
| Release | January 30 2025 | January 30 2025 |
| Ranking | #3 | #3 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.










