
GeForce PCX 5300

GeForce4 MX 4000
GeForce PCX 5300 vs GeForce4 MX 4000 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce PCX 5300 vs GeForce4 MX 4000 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce PCX 5300 vs GeForce4 MX 4000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce PCX 5300
2025Why buy it
- ✅+20% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($60 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2200% higher power demand at 575W vs 25W.
GeForce4 MX 4000
2020Why buy it
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 128 MB).
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 575W, a 550W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5 vs 6).
- ❌2020 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce PCX 5300 vs GeForce4 MX 4000 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce PCX 5300
The GeForce PCX 5300 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 30 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2017 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 21760 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 575W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 170 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6 points. Launch price was $1,999.

GeForce4 MX 4000
The GeForce4 MX 4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce PCX 5300 scores 6 versus the GeForce4 MX 4000's 5 — the GeForce PCX 5300 leads by 20%. The GeForce PCX 5300 is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the GeForce4 MX 4000 uses Turing, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 21,760 (GeForce PCX 5300) vs 896 (GeForce4 MX 4000). Raw compute: 104.8 TFLOPS (GeForce PCX 5300) vs 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce4 MX 4000). Boost clocks: 2407 MHz vs 1575 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce PCX 5300 | GeForce4 MX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6+20% | 5 |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 21760+2329% | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 104.8 TFLOPS+3149% | 3.226 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2407 MHz+53% | 1575 MHz |
| ROPs | 176+450% | 32 |
| TMUs | 680+963% | 64 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce PCX 5300 | GeForce4 MX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce PCX 5300 has 128 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce4 MX 4000 carries 512 MB. GeForce4 MX 4000 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce PCX 5300 and 64-bit on the GeForce4 MX 4000.
| Feature | GeForce PCX 5300 | GeForce4 MX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 0.5 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce PCX 5300) vs 7.0 (GeForce4 MX 4000). OpenGL: 1.5 vs 1.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce PCX 5300 | GeForce4 MX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0a+29% | 7.0 |
| OpenGL | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce PCX 5300) vs None (GeForce4 MX 4000). Decoder: None vs MPEG-2 Decoder.
| Feature | GeForce PCX 5300 | GeForce4 MX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | None |
| Decoder | None | MPEG-2 Decoder |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce PCX 5300 draws 575W versus the GeForce4 MX 4000's 25W — a 183.3% difference. The GeForce4 MX 4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce PCX 5300) vs 350W (GeForce4 MX 4000). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70 vs 60°C.
| Feature | GeForce PCX 5300 | GeForce4 MX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 575W | 25W-96% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | 168mm |
| Height | 100mm | 100mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 70 | 60°C-14% |
| Perf/Watt | 0.0 | 0.2 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce PCX 5300 came in at $60, while the GeForce4 MX 4000 launched at $0. On MSRP, GeForce4 MX 4000 was 100+% cheaper ($60 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.1 (GeForce PCX 5300) vs Infinity (GeForce4 MX 4000) — the GeForce4 MX 4000 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is GeForce PCX 5300 (2025 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce PCX 5300 | GeForce4 MX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $60 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.1 | Infinity |
| Codename | GB202 | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 |
| Release | January 30 2025 | August 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #3 | #523 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













