
GeForce4 Ti 4200

GeForce4 Ti 4400
GeForce4 Ti 4200 vs GeForce4 Ti 4400 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce4 Ti 4200 vs GeForce4 Ti 4400 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Warzone
GeForce4 Ti 4200 vs GeForce4 Ti 4400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce4 Ti 4200
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 28.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅Measures 175mm instead of 216mm, a 41mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6 vs 7).
GeForce4 Ti 4400
2022Why buy it
- ✅+16.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
Trade-offs
- ❌50.3% HIGHER MSRP$299 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌23.4% longer card at 216mm vs 175mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce4 Ti 4200 vs GeForce4 Ti 4400 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce4 Ti 4200
The GeForce4 Ti 4200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2022. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2235 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 16384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 450W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 128 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6 points. Launch price was $1,599.

GeForce4 Ti 4400
The GeForce4 Ti 4400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2022. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2235 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 16384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 450W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 128 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7 points. Launch price was $1,599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce4 Ti 4200 scores 6 versus the GeForce4 Ti 4400's 7 — the GeForce4 Ti 4400 leads by 16.7%. The GeForce4 Ti 4200 is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce4 Ti 4400 uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 16,384 (GeForce4 Ti 4200) vs 16,384 (GeForce4 Ti 4400). Raw compute: 82.58 TFLOPS (GeForce4 Ti 4200) vs 82.58 TFLOPS (GeForce4 Ti 4400). Boost clocks: 2520 MHz vs 2520 MHz. Ray tracing: 128 RT cores (GeForce4 Ti 4200) vs 128 (GeForce4 Ti 4400) with 512 Tensor cores vs 512.
| Feature | GeForce4 Ti 4200 | GeForce4 Ti 4400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6 | 7+17% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 16384 | 16384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 82.58 TFLOPS | 82.58 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2520 MHz | 2520 MHz |
| ROPs | 176 | 176 |
| TMUs | 512 | 512 |
| L1 Cache | 16 MB | 16 MB |
| L2 Cache | 72 MB | 72 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 128 | 128 |
| Tensor Cores | 512 | 512 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce4 Ti 4200 | GeForce4 Ti 4400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce4 Ti 4200 and 64-bit on the GeForce4 Ti 4400.
| Feature | GeForce4 Ti 4200 | GeForce4 Ti 4400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 72 MB | 72 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 8.1 (GeForce4 Ti 4200) vs 8.1 (GeForce4 Ti 4400). OpenGL: 1.5 vs 1.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce4 Ti 4200 | GeForce4 Ti 4400 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 8.1 | 8.1 |
| OpenGL | 1.5+15% | 1.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce4 Ti 4200) vs None (GeForce4 Ti 4400). Decoder: None vs MPEG-2 Decoder. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce4 Ti 4200) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce4 Ti 4400).
| Feature | GeForce4 Ti 4200 | GeForce4 Ti 4400 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | None |
| Decoder | None | MPEG-2 Decoder |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce4 Ti 4200 draws 450W versus the GeForce4 Ti 4400's 450W — a 0% difference. The GeForce4 Ti 4400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce4 Ti 4200) vs 350W (GeForce4 Ti 4400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 175mm vs 216mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 65 vs 65°C.
| Feature | GeForce4 Ti 4200 | GeForce4 Ti 4400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 450W | 450W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 175mm | 216mm |
| Height | 100mm | 100mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 65 | 65°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce4 Ti 4200 came in at $199, while the GeForce4 Ti 4400 launched at $299. On MSRP, GeForce4 Ti 4200 was 33.4% cheaper ($100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.0 (GeForce4 Ti 4200) vs 0.0 (GeForce4 Ti 4400) — the GeForce4 Ti 4400 offers 0% better value.
| Feature | GeForce4 Ti 4200 | GeForce4 Ti 4400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-33% | $299 |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Codename | AD102 | AD102 |
| Release | September 20 2022 | September 20 2022 |
| Ranking | #4 | #4 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













