
GeForce FX 5500

GeForce4 Ti 4200
GeForce FX 5500 vs GeForce4 Ti 4200 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce FX 5500 vs GeForce4 Ti 4200 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Warzone
GeForce FX 5500 vs GeForce4 Ti 4200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce FX 5500
2021Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $162 less on MSRP ($37 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 617.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.2 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($37 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 450W, a 425W reduction.
- ✅Measures 171mm instead of 175mm, a 4mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Older hardware, 256 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
GeForce4 Ti 4200
2022Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6 vs 8).
- ❌437.8% HIGHER MSRP$199 MSRPvs$37 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 0.2 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $37 MSRP).
- ❌1700% higher power demand at 450W vs 25W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce FX 5500 vs GeForce4 Ti 4200 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce FX 5500
The GeForce FX 5500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 17 2021. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock ranges from 1065 MHz to 1320 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8 points.

GeForce4 Ti 4200
The GeForce4 Ti 4200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2022. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2235 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 16384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 450W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 128 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6 points. Launch price was $1,599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX 5500 scores 8 versus the GeForce4 Ti 4200's 6 — the GeForce FX 5500 leads by 33.3%. The GeForce FX 5500 is built on Rankine while the GeForce4 Ti 4200 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce FX 5500) vs 16,384 (GeForce4 Ti 4200). Raw compute: 2.703 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5500) vs 82.58 TFLOPS (GeForce4 Ti 4200). Boost clocks: 1320 MHz vs 2520 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5500 | GeForce4 Ti 4200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8+33% | 6 |
| Architecture | Rankine | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 16384+1500% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.703 TFLOPS | 82.58 TFLOPS+2955% |
| Boost Clock | 1320 MHz | 2520 MHz+91% |
| ROPs | 16 | 176+1000% |
| TMUs | 32 | 512+1500% |
| L1 Cache | 2 MB | 16 MB+700% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 72 MB+3500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce FX 5500 | GeForce4 Ti 4200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce FX 5500 has 256 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce4 Ti 4200 carries 512 MB. GeForce4 Ti 4200 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce FX 5500 and 64-bit on the GeForce4 Ti 4200. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce FX 5500) vs 72 MB (GeForce4 Ti 4200) — the GeForce4 Ti 4200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5500 | GeForce4 Ti 4200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 72 MB+3500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX 5500) vs 8.1 (GeForce4 Ti 4200). Vulkan: None vs N/A. OpenGL: 1.5 vs 1.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5500 | GeForce4 Ti 4200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0a+11% | 8.1 |
| Vulkan | None | N/A |
| OpenGL | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce FX 5500) vs None (GeForce4 Ti 4200). Decoder: No vs None.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5500 | GeForce4 Ti 4200 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | None |
| Decoder | No | None |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce FX 5500 draws 25W versus the GeForce4 Ti 4200's 450W — a 178.9% difference. The GeForce FX 5500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5500) vs 350W (GeForce4 Ti 4200). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 171mm vs 175mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 65.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5500 | GeForce4 Ti 4200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-94% | 450W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 171mm | 175mm |
| Height | 111mm | 100mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | 65-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 0.3 | 0.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce FX 5500 came in at $37, while the GeForce4 Ti 4200 launched at $199. On MSRP, GeForce FX 5500 was 81.4% cheaper ($162 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.2 (GeForce FX 5500) vs 0.0 (GeForce4 Ti 4200) — the GeForce FX 5500 offers 100+% better value. The newer card here is GeForce4 Ti 4200 (2022 vs 2021).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5500 | GeForce4 Ti 4200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $37-81% | $199 |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.2 | 0.0 |
| Codename | TU117S | AD102 |
| Release | December 17 2021 | September 20 2022 |
| Ranking | #468 | #4 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













