GeForce4 MX 440 vs GeForce4 Ti 4200

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce4 MX 440 vs GeForce4 Ti 4200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce4 MX 440 vs GeForce4 Ti 4200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce4 MX 440

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
✅Delivers 11.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
✅Draws 25W instead of 450W, a 425W reduction.
✅Measures 165mm instead of 175mm, a 10mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5 vs 6).
❌Less VRAM, with 65 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2020 hardware with 65 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

GeForce4 Ti 4200

2022

Why buy it

✅+20% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅693.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 65 MB).
✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌
33.6% HIGHER MSRP
$199 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌1700% higher power demand at 450W vs 25W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce4 Ti 4200 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 20% in PassMark G3D (6 vs 5), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce4 Ti 4200 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs 65 MB of VRAM, a 5nm process instead of 12nm, 128 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2020. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce4 MX 440 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $50 cheaper on MSRP at $149 vs $199, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 11.3% (0.0 vs 0.0), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce4 MX 440 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce4 Ti 4200 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce4 MX 440 vs GeForce4 Ti 4200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce4 MX 440

The GeForce4 MX 440 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.

GeForce4 Ti 4200

The GeForce4 Ti 4200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2022. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2235 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 16384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 450W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 128 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6 points. Launch price was $1,599.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce4 MX 440 scores 5 versus the GeForce4 Ti 4200's 6 — the GeForce4 Ti 4200 leads by 20%. The GeForce4 MX 440 is built on Turing while the GeForce4 Ti 4200 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce4 MX 440) vs 16,384 (GeForce4 Ti 4200). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce4 MX 440) vs 82.58 TFLOPS (GeForce4 Ti 4200). Boost clocks: 1575 MHz vs 2520 MHz.

Feature	GeForce4 MX 440	GeForce4 Ti 4200
G3D Mark Score	5	6+20%
Architecture	Turing	Ada Lovelace
Process Node	12 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	896	16384+1729%
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.226 TFLOPS	82.58 TFLOPS+2460%
Boost Clock	1575 MHz	2520 MHz+60%
ROPs	32	176+450%
TMUs	64	512+700%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce4 MX 440	GeForce4 Ti 4200
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce4 MX 440 has 65 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce4 Ti 4200 carries 512 MB. GeForce4 Ti 4200 gives you 693.7% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce4 MX 440 and 64-bit on the GeForce4 Ti 4200.

Feature	GeForce4 MX 440	GeForce4 Ti 4200
VRAM Capacity	0.063 GB	0.5 GB+694%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 7.0 (GeForce4 MX 440) vs 8.1 (GeForce4 Ti 4200). OpenGL: 1.5 vs 1.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce4 MX 440	GeForce4 Ti 4200
DirectX	7.0	8.1+16%
OpenGL	1.5	1.5
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce4 MX 440) vs None (GeForce4 Ti 4200). Decoder: MPEG-2 Decoder vs None. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce4 MX 440) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce4 Ti 4200).

Feature	GeForce4 MX 440	GeForce4 Ti 4200
Encoder	None	None
Decoder	MPEG-2 Decoder	None
Codecs	MPEG-2	MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce4 MX 440 draws 25W versus the GeForce4 Ti 4200's 450W — a 178.9% difference. The GeForce4 MX 440 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce4 MX 440) vs 350W (GeForce4 Ti 4200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 165mm vs 175mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 60°C vs 65.

Feature	GeForce4 MX 440	GeForce4 Ti 4200
TDP	25W-94%	450W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	165mm	175mm
Height	100mm	100mm
Slots	1	1
Temp (Load)	60°C-8%	65
Perf/Watt	0.2	0.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce4 MX 440 came in at $149, while the GeForce4 Ti 4200 launched at $199. On MSRP, GeForce4 MX 440 was 25.1% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.0 (GeForce4 MX 440) vs 0.0 (GeForce4 Ti 4200) — the GeForce4 Ti 4200 offers 0% better value. The newer card here is GeForce4 Ti 4200 (2022 vs 2020).

Feature	GeForce4 MX 440	GeForce4 Ti 4200
MSRP	$149-25%	$199
Performance per Dollar	0.0	0.0
Codename	N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1	AD102
Release	August 1 2020	September 20 2022
Ranking	#523	#4

Search GeForce4 MX 440 on Amazon

Search GeForce4 Ti 4200 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.