GeForce4 MX 440 vs GeForce4 Ti 4400
GeForce4 MX 440
Popular choices:
GeForce4 Ti 4400
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce4 MX 440 is positioned at rank 750 and the GeForce4 Ti 4400 is on rank 384, so the GeForce4 Ti 4400 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce4 MX 440
Performance Per Dollar GeForce4 Ti 4400
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce4 Ti 4400 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 40% higher G3D Mark score and 693.7% more VRAM (512 MB vs 65 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce4 MX 440.
| Insight | GeForce4 MX 440 | GeForce4 Ti 4400 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-40%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+40%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) (5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+693.7%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce4 Ti 4400 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $49 (vs $49), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 40% better value per dollar than the GeForce4 MX 440.
| Insight | GeForce4 MX 440 | GeForce4 Ti 4400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+40%) |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce4 MX 440 and GeForce4 Ti 4400
GeForce4 MX 440
The GeForce4 MX 440 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.
GeForce4 Ti 4400
The GeForce4 Ti 4400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2022. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2235 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 16384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 450W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 128 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7 points. Launch price was $1,599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce4 MX 440 scores 5 versus the GeForce4 Ti 4400's 7 — the GeForce4 Ti 4400 leads by 40%. The GeForce4 MX 440 is built on Turing while the GeForce4 Ti 4400 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce4 MX 440) vs 16,384 (GeForce4 Ti 4400). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce4 MX 440) vs 82.58 TFLOPS (GeForce4 Ti 4400). Boost clocks: 1575 MHz vs 2520 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce4 MX 440 | GeForce4 Ti 4400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5 | 7+40% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 16384+1729% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.226 TFLOPS | 82.58 TFLOPS+2460% |
| Boost Clock | 1575 MHz | 2520 MHz+60% |
| ROPs | 32 | 176+450% |
| TMUs | 64 | 512+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce4 MX 440 | GeForce4 Ti 4400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce4 MX 440 comes with 65 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce4 Ti 4400 has 512 MB. The GeForce4 Ti 4400 offers 693.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce4 MX 440 | GeForce4 Ti 4400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.063 GB | 0.5 GB+694% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 7.0 (GeForce4 MX 440) vs 8.1 (GeForce4 Ti 4400). OpenGL: 1.5 vs 1.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce4 MX 440 | GeForce4 Ti 4400 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 7.0 | 8.1+16% |
| OpenGL | 1.5+15% | 1.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce4 MX 440) vs None (GeForce4 Ti 4400). Decoder: MPEG-2 Decoder vs MPEG-2 Decoder. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce4 MX 440) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce4 Ti 4400).
| Feature | GeForce4 MX 440 | GeForce4 Ti 4400 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | None |
| Decoder | MPEG-2 Decoder | MPEG-2 Decoder |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce4 MX 440 draws 25W versus the GeForce4 Ti 4400's 450W — a 178.9% difference. The GeForce4 MX 440 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce4 MX 440) vs 350W (GeForce4 Ti 4400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 165mm vs 216mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 60°C vs 65°C.
| Feature | GeForce4 MX 440 | GeForce4 Ti 4400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-94% | 450W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 165mm | 216mm |
| Height | 100mm | 100mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 60°C-8% | 65°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.2 | 0.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce4 MX 440 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the GeForce4 Ti 4400 launched at $299 and now averages $49. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.1 (GeForce4 MX 440) vs 0.1 (GeForce4 Ti 4400) — the GeForce4 Ti 4400 offers 0% better value. The GeForce4 Ti 4400 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce4 MX 440 | GeForce4 Ti 4400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-50% | $299 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49 | $49 |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Codename | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 | AD102 |
| Release | August 1 2020 | September 20 2022 |
| Ranking | #523 | #4 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce4 MX 440 and GeForce4 Ti 4400
