
GeForce4 MX 440

GeForce4 Ti 4600
GeForce4 MX 440 vs GeForce4 Ti 4600 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce4 MX 440 vs GeForce4 Ti 4600 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce4 MX 440 vs GeForce4 Ti 4600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce4 MX 440
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $250 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 123.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅GeForce4 Ti 4600 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce4 MX 440 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 160W, a 135W reduction.
- ✅Measures 165mm instead of 216mm, a 51mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5 vs 6).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 65 MB vs 128 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2020 hardware with 65 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
GeForce4 Ti 4600
2010Why buy it
- ✅+20% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅98.4% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (128 MB vs 65 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2010 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌167.8% HIGHER MSRP$399 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌540% higher power demand at 160W vs 25W.
- ❌30.9% longer card at 216mm vs 165mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce4 MX 440 vs GeForce4 Ti 4600 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce4 MX 440
The GeForce4 MX 440 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.

GeForce4 Ti 4600
The GeForce4 Ti 4600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 12 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6 points. Launch price was $229.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce4 MX 440 scores 5 versus the GeForce4 Ti 4600's 6 — the GeForce4 Ti 4600 leads by 20%. The GeForce4 MX 440 is built on Turing while the GeForce4 Ti 4600 uses Fermi, both on 12 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce4 MX 440) vs 336 (GeForce4 Ti 4600). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce4 MX 440) vs 0.9072 TFLOPS (GeForce4 Ti 4600).
| Feature | GeForce4 MX 440 | GeForce4 Ti 4600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5 | 6+20% |
| Architecture | Turing | Fermi |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 896+167% | 336 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.226 TFLOPS+256% | 0.9072 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 64+14% | 56 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce4 MX 440 | GeForce4 Ti 4600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce4 MX 440 has 65 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce4 Ti 4600 carries 128 MB. GeForce4 Ti 4600 gives you 98.4% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce4 MX 440 and 64-bit on the GeForce4 Ti 4600.
| Feature | GeForce4 MX 440 | GeForce4 Ti 4600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.063 GB | 0.125 GB+98% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 7.0 (GeForce4 MX 440) vs 8.1 (GeForce4 Ti 4600). OpenGL: 1.5 vs 1.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce4 MX 440 | GeForce4 Ti 4600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 7.0 | 8.1+16% |
| OpenGL | 1.5+15% | 1.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce4 MX 440) vs No (GeForce4 Ti 4600). Decoder: MPEG-2 Decoder vs No.
| Feature | GeForce4 MX 440 | GeForce4 Ti 4600 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | No |
| Decoder | MPEG-2 Decoder | No |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce4 MX 440 draws 25W versus the GeForce4 Ti 4600's 160W — a 145.9% difference. The GeForce4 MX 440 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce4 MX 440) vs 350W (GeForce4 Ti 4600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 165mm vs 216mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 60°C vs 65°C.
| Feature | GeForce4 MX 440 | GeForce4 Ti 4600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-84% | 160W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 165mm | 216mm |
| Height | 100mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 60°C-8% | 65°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.2 | 0.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce4 MX 440 came in at $149, while the GeForce4 Ti 4600 launched at $399. On MSRP, GeForce4 MX 440 was 62.7% cheaper ($250 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.0 (GeForce4 MX 440) vs 0.0 (GeForce4 Ti 4600) — the GeForce4 Ti 4600 offers 0% better value. The newer card here is GeForce4 MX 440 (2020 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce4 MX 440 | GeForce4 Ti 4600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-63% | $399 |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Codename | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 | GF104 |
| Release | August 1 2020 | July 12 2010 |
| Ranking | #523 | #652 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














