GeForce4 MX 440 vs Radeon IGP 320M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce4 MX 440 is positioned at rank 750 and the Radeon IGP 320M is on rank 412, so the Radeon IGP 320M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce4 MX 440

#739

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

361900%

#741

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

328067%

#742

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

327200%

#746

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

297533%

#747

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

295500%

#749

GeForce2 MX/MX 400

MSRP: $129|Avg: $15

100%

#750

GeForce4 MX 440

MSRP: $149|Avg: $49

100%

#751

RADEON 7200

MSRP: $99|Avg: $45

100%

#752

GeForce 256

MSRP: $199|Avg: $20

100%

#753

GeForce2 MX

MSRP: $129|Avg: $49

67%

#754

GeForce4 440

MSRP: $469|Avg: $49

33%

#755

GeForce3

MSRP: $499|Avg: $49

33%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon IGP 320M

#397

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

113638%

#412

Radeon IGP 320M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#413

GRID P4-1Q

MSRP: $5890|Avg: $185

92%

#415

GRID RTX6000-2Q

MSRP: $6300|Avg: $1500

77%

#417

GRID M60-0B

MSRP: $19900|Avg: $19900

69%

#418

Quadro FX 4500 X2

MSRP: $2799|Avg: $2799

62%

#419

Quadro FX 5500

MSRP: $2999|Avg: $30

62%

#420

Quadro FX 1000

MSRP: $500|Avg: $30

54%

#421

Quadro FX 3400/4400

MSRP: $1799|Avg: $50

46%

#422

Quadro FX 1300

MSRP: $599|Avg: $15

46%

#423

Quadro FX 4000

MSRP: $2199|Avg: $50

38%

#424

RADEON IGP 320

MSRP: $100|Avg: $20

31%

#425

Quadro FX 500/FX 600

MSRP: $449|Avg: $15

15%

#426

Quadro FX 2000

MSRP: $3000|Avg: $40

8%

#427

GRID V100-8Q

MSRP: $10000|Avg: $10000

0%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce4 MX 440 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 25% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon IGP 320M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	GeForce4 MX 440	Radeon IGP 320M
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+25%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-25%)
Longevity	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)	RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+693.7%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce4 MX 440 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce4 MX 440 Benchmark Check

Radeon IGP 320M Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce4 MX 440 and Radeon IGP 320M

GeForce4 MX 440

The GeForce4 MX 440 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.

Radeon IGP 320M

The Radeon IGP 320M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1250 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce4 MX 440 scores 5 versus the Radeon IGP 320M's 4 — the GeForce4 MX 440 leads by 25%. The GeForce4 MX 440 is built on Turing while the Radeon IGP 320M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce4 MX 440) vs 1,280 (Radeon IGP 320M). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce4 MX 440) vs 3.2 TFLOPS (Radeon IGP 320M). Boost clocks: 1575 MHz vs 1250 MHz.

Feature	GeForce4 MX 440	Radeon IGP 320M
G3D Mark Score	5+25%	4
Architecture	Turing	RDNA 1.0
Process Node	12 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	896	1280+43%
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.226 TFLOPS	3.2 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1575 MHz+26%	1250 MHz
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	64	80+25%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce4 MX 440	Radeon IGP 320M
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce4 MX 440 comes with 65 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon IGP 320M has 512 MB. The Radeon IGP 320M offers 693.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.

Feature	GeForce4 MX 440	Radeon IGP 320M
VRAM Capacity	0.063 GB	0.5 GB+694%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce4 MX 440	Radeon IGP 320M
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce4 MX 440) vs None (Radeon IGP 320M). Decoder: MPEG-2 Decoder vs None. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce4 MX 440) vs MPEG-2 (Radeon IGP 320M).

Feature	GeForce4 MX 440	Radeon IGP 320M
Encoder	None	None
Decoder	MPEG-2 Decoder	None
Codecs	MPEG-2	MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce4 MX 440 draws 25W versus the Radeon IGP 320M's 85W — a 109.1% difference. The GeForce4 MX 440 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce4 MX 440) vs 350W (Radeon IGP 320M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.