GeForce4 Ti 4200 vs Quadro FX 500/FX 600

NVIDIA

GeForce4 Ti 4200

2022Core: 2235 MHzBoost: 2520 MHz
Similar parts
······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro FX 500/FX 600

2008Core: 610 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce4 Ti 4200 vs Quadro FX 500/FX 600 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce4 Ti 4200 vs Quadro FX 500/FX 600 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce4 Ti 4200 vs Quadro FX 500/FX 600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce4 Ti 4200

2022

Why buy it

  • Costs $250 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
  • Delivers 69.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
  • Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (6 vs 8).
  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 138.1% higher power demand at 450W vs 189W.

Quadro FX 500/FX 600

2008

Why buy it

  • +33.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • 700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Draws 189W instead of 450W, a 261W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2008 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 125.6% HIGHER MSRP
    $449 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($449 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro FX 500/FX 600 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 33.3% in PassMark G3D (8 vs 6), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce4 Ti 4200 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 5nm process instead of 55nm, 128 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2008. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce4 Ti 4200 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $250 cheaper on MSRP at $199 vs $449, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 69.2% (0.0 vs 0.0), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Quadro FX 500/FX 600 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce4 Ti 4200 vs Quadro FX 500/FX 600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce4 Ti 4200

The GeForce4 Ti 4200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2022. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2235 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 16384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 450W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 128 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6 points. Launch price was $1,599.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 500/FX 600

The Quadro FX 500/FX 600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce4 Ti 4200 scores 6 versus the Quadro FX 500/FX 600's 8 — the Quadro FX 500/FX 600 leads by 33.3%. The GeForce4 Ti 4200 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro FX 500/FX 600 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 16,384 (GeForce4 Ti 4200) vs 240 (Quadro FX 500/FX 600). Raw compute: 82.58 TFLOPS (GeForce4 Ti 4200) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 500/FX 600).

FeatureGeForce4 Ti 4200Quadro FX 500/FX 600
G3D Mark Score
6
8+33%
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Tesla 2.0
Process Node
5 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
16384+6727%
240
Compute (TFLOPS)
82.58 TFLOPS+13174%
0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs
176+450%
32
TMUs
512+540%
80
L2 Cache
72 MB+28700%
0.25 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce4 Ti 4200 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 500/FX 600 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce4 Ti 4200Quadro FX 500/FX 600
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce4 Ti 4200 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 500/FX 600 carries 4 GB. Quadro FX 500/FX 600 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce4 Ti 4200 and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 500/FX 600. L2 Cache: 72 MB (GeForce4 Ti 4200) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 500/FX 600) — the GeForce4 Ti 4200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce4 Ti 4200Quadro FX 500/FX 600
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
4 GB+700%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
72 MB+28700%
0.25 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce4 Ti 4200 draws 450W versus the Quadro FX 500/FX 600's 189W — a 81.7% difference. The Quadro FX 500/FX 600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce4 Ti 4200) vs 350W (Quadro FX 500/FX 600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce4 Ti 4200Quadro FX 500/FX 600
TDP
450W
189W-58%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
175mm
Height
100mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
65
Perf/Watt
0.0
0.0
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce4 Ti 4200 came in at $199, while the Quadro FX 500/FX 600 launched at $449. On MSRP, GeForce4 Ti 4200 was 55.7% cheaper ($250 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.0 (GeForce4 Ti 4200) vs 0.0 (Quadro FX 500/FX 600) — the Quadro FX 500/FX 600 offers 0% better value. The newer card here is GeForce4 Ti 4200 (2022 vs 2008).

FeatureGeForce4 Ti 4200Quadro FX 500/FX 600
MSRP
$199-56%
$449
Performance per Dollar
0.0
0.0
Codename
AD102
GT200B
Release
September 20 2022
November 11 2008
Ranking
#4
#815

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.