
GeForce4 Ti 4200

Quadro FX 500/FX 600
GeForce4 Ti 4200 vs Quadro FX 500/FX 600 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce4 Ti 4200 vs Quadro FX 500/FX 600 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Warzone
GeForce4 Ti 4200 vs Quadro FX 500/FX 600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce4 Ti 4200
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $250 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 69.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6 vs 8).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌138.1% higher power demand at 450W vs 189W.
Quadro FX 500/FX 600
2008Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Draws 189W instead of 450W, a 261W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2008 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌125.6% HIGHER MSRP$449 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($449 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce4 Ti 4200 vs Quadro FX 500/FX 600 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce4 Ti 4200
The GeForce4 Ti 4200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2022. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2235 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 16384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 450W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 128 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6 points. Launch price was $1,599.

Quadro FX 500/FX 600
The Quadro FX 500/FX 600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce4 Ti 4200 scores 6 versus the Quadro FX 500/FX 600's 8 — the Quadro FX 500/FX 600 leads by 33.3%. The GeForce4 Ti 4200 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro FX 500/FX 600 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 16,384 (GeForce4 Ti 4200) vs 240 (Quadro FX 500/FX 600). Raw compute: 82.58 TFLOPS (GeForce4 Ti 4200) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 500/FX 600).
| Feature | GeForce4 Ti 4200 | Quadro FX 500/FX 600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6 | 8+33% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 16384+6727% | 240 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 82.58 TFLOPS+13174% | 0.6221 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 176+450% | 32 |
| TMUs | 512+540% | 80 |
| L2 Cache | 72 MB+28700% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce4 Ti 4200 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 500/FX 600 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce4 Ti 4200 | Quadro FX 500/FX 600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce4 Ti 4200 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 500/FX 600 carries 4 GB. Quadro FX 500/FX 600 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce4 Ti 4200 and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 500/FX 600. L2 Cache: 72 MB (GeForce4 Ti 4200) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 500/FX 600) — the GeForce4 Ti 4200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce4 Ti 4200 | Quadro FX 500/FX 600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 4 GB+700% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 72 MB+28700% | 0.25 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce4 Ti 4200 draws 450W versus the Quadro FX 500/FX 600's 189W — a 81.7% difference. The Quadro FX 500/FX 600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce4 Ti 4200) vs 350W (Quadro FX 500/FX 600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce4 Ti 4200 | Quadro FX 500/FX 600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 450W | 189W-58% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 175mm | — |
| Height | 100mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 65 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce4 Ti 4200 came in at $199, while the Quadro FX 500/FX 600 launched at $449. On MSRP, GeForce4 Ti 4200 was 55.7% cheaper ($250 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.0 (GeForce4 Ti 4200) vs 0.0 (Quadro FX 500/FX 600) — the Quadro FX 500/FX 600 offers 0% better value. The newer card here is GeForce4 Ti 4200 (2022 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce4 Ti 4200 | Quadro FX 500/FX 600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-56% | $449 |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Codename | AD102 | GT200B |
| Release | September 20 2022 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #4 | #815 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













