GeForce4 Ti 4400 vs Quadro FX 500/FX 600

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce4 Ti 4400 is positioned at rank 384 and the Quadro FX 500/FX 600 is on rank 425, so the GeForce4 Ti 4400 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce4 Ti 4400

#1

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

MSRP: $399|Avg: $280

362700%

#2

GeForce RTX 5060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

348450%

#3

Radeon RX 5600 XT

MSRP: $279|Avg: $180

344400%

#4

Radeon RX 9060

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

343800%

#5

GeForce RTX 5050

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

343100%

#6

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

MSRP: $249|Avg: $150

341150%

#7

Arc A580

MSRP: $179|Avg: $179

336850%

#8

Radeon RX 9060 XT

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

335600%

#9

Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

332500%

#10

Radeon RX 7600

MSRP: $269|Avg: $250

331600%

#11

Radeon RX 6600

MSRP: $329|Avg: $180

327600%

#12

GeForce RTX 4060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

326900%

#13

Arc B570

MSRP: $219|Avg: $219

321000%

#14

Arc B580

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

320800%

#365

Radeon R5 430 OEM

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13

400000%

#380

GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE

MSRP: $299|Avg: $30

100%

#381

GeForce4 Ti 4800

MSRP: $399|Avg: $40

100%

#382

GeForce4 MX 460

MSRP: $179|Avg: $15

100%

#383

GeForce4 Ti 4600

MSRP: $399|Avg: $40

100%

#384

GeForce4 Ti 4400

MSRP: $299|Avg: $49

100%

#385

RADEON 7500

MSRP: $199|Avg: $50

100%

#386

GeForce3 Ti 500

MSRP: $349|Avg: $49

50%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 500/FX 600

#410

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

738650%

#425

Quadro FX 500/FX 600

MSRP: $449|Avg: $15

100%

#426

Quadro FX 2000

MSRP: $3000|Avg: $40

50%

#427

GRID V100-8Q

MSRP: $10000|Avg: $10000

0%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce4 Ti 4400 is significantly newer (2022 vs 2008). The GeForce4 Ti 4400 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX 500/FX 600 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro FX 500/FX 600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 14.3% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce4 Ti 4400.

Insight	GeForce4 Ti 4400	Quadro FX 500/FX 600
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-14.3%)	✅Leading raw performance (+14.3%)
Longevity	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) (5nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+700%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

The Quadro FX 500/FX 600 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $15 versus $49 for the GeForce4 Ti 4400, it costs 69% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 273.3% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	GeForce4 Ti 4400	Quadro FX 500/FX 600
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+273.3%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49)	✅More affordable ($15)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce4 Ti 4400 Benchmark Check

Quadro FX 500/FX 600 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce4 Ti 4400 and Quadro FX 500/FX 600

GeForce4 Ti 4400

The GeForce4 Ti 4400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2022. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2235 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 16384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 450W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 128 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7 points. Launch price was $1,599.

Quadro FX 500/FX 600

The Quadro FX 500/FX 600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8 points. Launch price was $3,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce4 Ti 4400 scores 7 versus the Quadro FX 500/FX 600's 8 — the Quadro FX 500/FX 600 leads by 14.3%. The GeForce4 Ti 4400 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro FX 500/FX 600 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 16,384 (GeForce4 Ti 4400) vs 240 (Quadro FX 500/FX 600). Raw compute: 82.58 TFLOPS (GeForce4 Ti 4400) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 500/FX 600).

Feature	GeForce4 Ti 4400	Quadro FX 500/FX 600
G3D Mark Score	7	8+14%
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	5 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	16384+6727%	240
Compute (TFLOPS)	82.58 TFLOPS+13174%	0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs	176+450%	32
TMUs	512+540%	80
L2 Cache	72 MB+28700%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce4 Ti 4400	Quadro FX 500/FX 600
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce4 Ti 4400 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 500/FX 600 has 4 GB. The Quadro FX 500/FX 600 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 72 MB (GeForce4 Ti 4400) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 500/FX 600) — the GeForce4 Ti 4400 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce4 Ti 4400	Quadro FX 500/FX 600
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	4 GB+700%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	72 MB+28700%	0.25 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce4 Ti 4400 draws 450W versus the Quadro FX 500/FX 600's 189W — a 81.7% difference. The Quadro FX 500/FX 600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce4 Ti 4400) vs 350W (Quadro FX 500/FX 600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce4 Ti 4400	Quadro FX 500/FX 600
TDP	450W	189W-58%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	216mm	—
Height	100mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	65°C	—
Perf/Watt	0.0	0.0

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce4 Ti 4400 launched at $299 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the Quadro FX 500/FX 600 launched at $449 and now averages $15. The Quadro FX 500/FX 600 costs 69.4% less ($34 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.1 (GeForce4 Ti 4400) vs 0.5 (Quadro FX 500/FX 600) — the Quadro FX 500/FX 600 offers 400% better value. The GeForce4 Ti 4400 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2008).