
MOBILITY/RADEON 9000

RADEON 7500
MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 vs RADEON 7500 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 vs RADEON 7500 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 vs RADEON 7500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
MOBILITY/RADEON 9000
2010Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅693.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 65 MB).
- ✅Draws 10W instead of 50W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
RADEON 7500
2017Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3 vs 4).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 65 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2017 hardware with 65 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌400% higher power demand at 50W vs 10W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 vs RADEON 7500 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

MOBILITY/RADEON 9000
The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

RADEON 7500
The RADEON 7500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points. Launch price was $79.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 scores 4 versus the RADEON 7500's 3 — the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 leads by 33.3%. The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 is built on TeraScale 2 while the RADEON 7500 uses GCN 4.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 800 (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs 512 (RADEON 7500). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs 1.211 TFLOPS (RADEON 7500).
| Feature | MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 | RADEON 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4+33% | 3 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 800+56% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.12 TFLOPS | 1.211 TFLOPS+8% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40+25% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB | 128 KB+60% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 | RADEON 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON 7500 carries 65 MB. MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 gives you 693.7% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 and 128-bit on the RADEON 7500.
| Feature | MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 | RADEON 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+694% | 0.063 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 8.1 (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs 8.1 (RADEON 7500). OpenGL: 1.4 vs 1.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 | RADEON 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 8.1 | 8.1 |
| OpenGL | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: N/A (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs Legacy (RADEON 7500). Decoder: MPEG-2 vs Legacy. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs MPEG-1,MPEG-2 (RADEON 7500).
| Feature | MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 | RADEON 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | N/A | Legacy |
| Decoder | MPEG-2 | Legacy |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | MPEG-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 draws 10W versus the RADEON 7500's 50W — a 133.3% difference. The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 0W (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs 350W (RADEON 7500). Power connectors: None vs Legacy.
| Feature | MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 | RADEON 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 10W-80% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 0W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | Legacy |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 70 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.4+300% | 0.1 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 came in at $0, while the RADEON 7500 launched at $199. On MSRP, MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 was 100+% cheaper ($199 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs 0.0 (RADEON 7500) — the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 offers 100+% better value. The newer card here is RADEON 7500 (2017 vs 2010).
| Feature | MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 | RADEON 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $199 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 0.0 |
| Codename | Broadway | Lexa |
| Release | January 7 2010 | April 20 2017 |
| Ranking | #846 | #668 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














