Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 vs RADEON 9200 SE

CPUCPUGPUGPU
AMD

MOBILITY/RADEON 9000

2010Core: 700 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

RADEON 9200 SE

2025Core: 1295 MHzBoost: 2900 MHz
Similar parts
······
Buy on Amazon

MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 vs RADEON 9200 SE Performance Spectrum

MOBILITY/RADEON 9000
0.5 GB 10
4
+33.3%
brand logoRADEON 7500
brand logoMOBILITY RADEON 9000
brand logoRadeon HD 7950 / R9 280
brand logoRadeon R9 Fury
brand logoRadeon RX 5700
brand logoRadeon RX 6700
brand logoRadeon RX 7800 XT
brand logoRadeon RX 7900 XT
RADEON 9200 SE
0.25 GB 55
3
0.0%
brand logoRadeon R9 370
brand logoRadeon R9 Fury
brand logoRadeon RX 5700
brand logoRadeon RX 6700
brand logoRadeon RX 7800 XT
brand logoRadeon RX 7900 XT

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 vs RADEON 9200 SE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

MOBILITY/RADEON 9000

2010

Why buy it

  • ✅+33.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
  • ✅Draws 10W instead of 55W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $30 MSRP).

RADEON 9200 SE

2025

Why buy it

  • ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($30 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3 vs 4).
  • ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌450% higher power demand at 55W vs 10W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 33.3% in PassMark G3D (4 vs 3), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
RADEON 9200 SE is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 4nm process instead of 40nm, 40 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2010. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
RADEON 9200 SE makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 vs RADEON 9200 SE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

MOBILITY/RADEON 9000

The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

AMD

RADEON 9200 SE

The RADEON 9200 SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 scores 4 versus the RADEON 9200 SE's 3 — the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 leads by 33.3%. The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 is built on TeraScale 2 while the RADEON 9200 SE uses RDNA 3.5, both on 40 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 800 (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs 2,560 (RADEON 9200 SE). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs 14.85 TFLOPS (RADEON 9200 SE).

FeatureMOBILITY/RADEON 9000RADEON 9200 SE
G3D Mark Score
4+33%
3
Architecture
TeraScale 2
RDNA 3.5
Process Node
40 nm
4 nm
Shading Units
800
2560+220%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.12 TFLOPS
14.85 TFLOPS+1226%
ROPs
16
64+300%
TMUs
40
160+300%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
8 MB+3100%
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureMOBILITY/RADEON 9000RADEON 9200 SE
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON 9200 SE carries 256 MB. MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 and 64-bit on the RADEON 9200 SE. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs 8 MB (RADEON 9200 SE) — the RADEON 9200 SE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureMOBILITY/RADEON 9000RADEON 9200 SE
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB+100%
0.25 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
8 MB+3100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 8.1 (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs 8.1 (RADEON 9200 SE). Vulkan: N/A vs N/A. OpenGL: 1.4 vs 1.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureMOBILITY/RADEON 9000RADEON 9200 SE
DirectX
8.1
8.1
Vulkan
N/A
N/A
OpenGL
1.4+8%
1.3
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: N/A (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs None (RADEON 9200 SE). Decoder: MPEG-2 vs None. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs MPEG-2 (RADEON 9200 SE).

FeatureMOBILITY/RADEON 9000RADEON 9200 SE
Encoder
N/A
None
Decoder
MPEG-2
None
Codecs
MPEG-2
MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 draws 10W versus the RADEON 9200 SE's 55W — a 138.5% difference. The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 0W (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs 350W (RADEON 9200 SE). Power connectors: None vs Legacy. Card length: 0mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70 vs 60.

FeatureMOBILITY/RADEON 9000RADEON 9200 SE
TDP
10W-82%
55W
Recommended PSU
0W-100%
350W
Power Connector
None
Legacy
Length
0mm
168mm
Height
0mm
111mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
70
60-14%
Perf/Watt
0.4+300%
0.1
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 came in at $0, while the RADEON 9200 SE launched at $30. On MSRP, MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 was 100+% cheaper ($30 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs 0.1 (RADEON 9200 SE) — the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is RADEON 9200 SE (2025 vs 2010).

FeatureMOBILITY/RADEON 9000RADEON 9200 SE
MSRP
$0-100%
$30
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
0.1
Codename
Broadway
Strix Halo
Release
January 7 2010
January 6 2025
Ranking
#846
#98
Search MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 on AmazonSearch RADEON 9200 SE on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.