
MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 vs GeForce4 440

MOBILITY/RADEON 9000
Popular choices:

GeForce4 440
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce4 440
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce4 440 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 25% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000.
| Insight | MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 | GeForce4 440 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-25%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+25%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce4 440 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce4 440 holds the technical lead. Priced at $49 (vs $49), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 25% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 | GeForce4 440 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+25%) |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 and GeForce4 440

MOBILITY/RADEON 9000
The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

GeForce4 440
The GeForce4 440 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1072 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 scores 4 versus the GeForce4 440's 5 — the GeForce4 440 leads by 25%. The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 is built on TeraScale 2 while the GeForce4 440 uses Maxwell, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 800 (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs 384 (GeForce4 440). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs 0.9032 TFLOPS (GeForce4 440).
| Feature | MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 | GeForce4 440 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4 | 5+25% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 800+108% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.12 TFLOPS+24% | 0.9032 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 40+67% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB | 192 KB+140% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 | GeForce4 440 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs 1 MB (GeForce4 440) — the GeForce4 440 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 | GeForce4 440 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 8.1 (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs 7.0 (GeForce4 440). Vulkan: N/A vs N/A. OpenGL: 1.4 vs 1.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 | GeForce4 440 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 8.1+16% | 7.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| OpenGL | 1.4 | 1.5+7% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: N/A (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs None (GeForce4 440). Decoder: MPEG-2 vs None. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce4 440).
| Feature | MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 | GeForce4 440 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | N/A | None |
| Decoder | MPEG-2 | None |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 draws 10W versus the GeForce4 440's 33W — a 107% difference. The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 0W (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs 350W (GeForce4 440). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 170mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70 vs 70.
| Feature | MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 | GeForce4 440 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 10W-70% | 33W |
| Recommended PSU | 0W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 170mm |
| Height | 0mm | 100mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 70 | 70 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.4+100% | 0.2 |
Value Analysis
The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the GeForce4 440 launched at $469 and now averages $49. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.1 (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs 0.1 (GeForce4 440) — the GeForce4 440 offers 0% better value. The GeForce4 440 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2010).
| Feature | MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 | GeForce4 440 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $469 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49 | $49 |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Codename | Broadway | GM108 |
| Release | January 7 2010 | March 13 2015 |
| Ranking | #846 | #847 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















