MOBILITY/RADEON 9000
VS
GeForce4 MX 4000

MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 vs GeForce4 MX 4000

AMD

MOBILITY/RADEON 9000

2010Core: 700 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce4 MX 4000

2020Core: 1395 MHzBoost: 1575 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce4 MX 4000 is significantly newer (2020 vs 2010). The GeForce4 MX 4000 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce4 MX 4000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 25% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000.

InsightMOBILITY/RADEON 9000GeForce4 MX 4000
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-25%)
Leading raw performance (+25%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce4 MX 4000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $49 (vs $49), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 25% better value per dollar than the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000.

InsightMOBILITY/RADEON 9000GeForce4 MX 4000
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+25%)
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 and GeForce4 MX 4000

AMD

MOBILITY/RADEON 9000

The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce4 MX 4000

The GeForce4 MX 4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 scores 4 versus the GeForce4 MX 4000's 5 — the GeForce4 MX 4000 leads by 25%. The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 is built on TeraScale 2 while the GeForce4 MX 4000 uses Turing, both on 40 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 800 (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs 896 (GeForce4 MX 4000). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce4 MX 4000).

FeatureMOBILITY/RADEON 9000GeForce4 MX 4000
G3D Mark Score
4
5+25%
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Turing
Process Node
40 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
800
896+12%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.12 TFLOPS
3.226 TFLOPS+188%
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
40
64+60%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureMOBILITY/RADEON 9000GeForce4 MX 4000
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.

FeatureMOBILITY/RADEON 9000GeForce4 MX 4000
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 8.1 (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs 7.0 (GeForce4 MX 4000). OpenGL: 1.4 vs 1.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureMOBILITY/RADEON 9000GeForce4 MX 4000
DirectX
8.1+16%
7.0
OpenGL
1.4
1.5+7%
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: N/A (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs None (GeForce4 MX 4000). Decoder: MPEG-2 vs MPEG-2 Decoder. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce4 MX 4000).

FeatureMOBILITY/RADEON 9000GeForce4 MX 4000
Encoder
N/A
None
Decoder
MPEG-2
MPEG-2 Decoder
Codecs
MPEG-2
MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 draws 10W versus the GeForce4 MX 4000's 25W — a 85.7% difference. The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 0W (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs 350W (GeForce4 MX 4000). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70 vs 60°C.

FeatureMOBILITY/RADEON 9000GeForce4 MX 4000
TDP
10W-60%
25W
Recommended PSU
0W-100%
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
168mm
Height
0mm
100mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
70
60°C-14%
Perf/Watt
0.4+100%
0.2
💰

Value Analysis

The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the GeForce4 MX 4000 launched at $0 and now averages $49. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.1 (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs 0.1 (GeForce4 MX 4000) — the GeForce4 MX 4000 offers 0% better value. The GeForce4 MX 4000 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2010).

FeatureMOBILITY/RADEON 9000GeForce4 MX 4000
MSRP
$0
$0
Avg Price (30d)
$49
$49
Performance per Dollar
0.1
0.1
Codename
Broadway
N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1
Release
January 7 2010
August 1 2020
Ranking
#846
#523