
MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 vs GeForce4 MX 4000

MOBILITY/RADEON 9000
Popular choices:

GeForce4 MX 4000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce4 MX 4000 is significantly newer (2020 vs 2010). The GeForce4 MX 4000 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce4 MX 4000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 25% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000.
| Insight | MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 | GeForce4 MX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-25%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+25%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce4 MX 4000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $49 (vs $49), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 25% better value per dollar than the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000.
| Insight | MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 | GeForce4 MX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+25%) |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 and GeForce4 MX 4000

MOBILITY/RADEON 9000
The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

GeForce4 MX 4000
The GeForce4 MX 4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 scores 4 versus the GeForce4 MX 4000's 5 — the GeForce4 MX 4000 leads by 25%. The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 is built on TeraScale 2 while the GeForce4 MX 4000 uses Turing, both on 40 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 800 (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs 896 (GeForce4 MX 4000). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce4 MX 4000).
| Feature | MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 | GeForce4 MX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4 | 5+25% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Turing |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 800 | 896+12% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.12 TFLOPS | 3.226 TFLOPS+188% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 40 | 64+60% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 | GeForce4 MX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 | GeForce4 MX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 8.1 (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs 7.0 (GeForce4 MX 4000). OpenGL: 1.4 vs 1.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 | GeForce4 MX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 8.1+16% | 7.0 |
| OpenGL | 1.4 | 1.5+7% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: N/A (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs None (GeForce4 MX 4000). Decoder: MPEG-2 vs MPEG-2 Decoder. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce4 MX 4000).
| Feature | MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 | GeForce4 MX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | N/A | None |
| Decoder | MPEG-2 | MPEG-2 Decoder |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 draws 10W versus the GeForce4 MX 4000's 25W — a 85.7% difference. The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 0W (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs 350W (GeForce4 MX 4000). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70 vs 60°C.
| Feature | MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 | GeForce4 MX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 10W-60% | 25W |
| Recommended PSU | 0W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 168mm |
| Height | 0mm | 100mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 70 | 60°C-14% |
| Perf/Watt | 0.4+100% | 0.2 |
Value Analysis
The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the GeForce4 MX 4000 launched at $0 and now averages $49. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.1 (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs 0.1 (GeForce4 MX 4000) — the GeForce4 MX 4000 offers 0% better value. The GeForce4 MX 4000 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2010).
| Feature | MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 | GeForce4 MX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | $0 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49 | $49 |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Codename | Broadway | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 |
| Release | January 7 2010 | August 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #846 | #523 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













