MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 vs Radeon IGP 340M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 vs Radeon IGP 340M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 vs Radeon IGP 340M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

MOBILITY/RADEON 9000

2010

Why buy it

✅+33.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Draws 10W instead of 230W, a 220W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon IGP 340M

2018

Why buy it

✅MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon IGP 340M is the less risky modern option long term.
✅More future proof: GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3 vs 4).
❌2018 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌2200% higher power demand at 230W vs 10W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 33.3% in PassMark G3D (4 vs 3), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon IGP 340M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 14nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2018 generation instead of 2010. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon IGP 340M has the stronger long-term case.

MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 vs Radeon IGP 340M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

MOBILITY/RADEON 9000

The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

Radeon IGP 340M

The Radeon IGP 340M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 26 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 852 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 scores 4 versus the Radeon IGP 340M's 3 — the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 leads by 33.3%. The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon IGP 340M uses GCN 5.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 800 (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs 3,584 (Radeon IGP 340M). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs 10.75 TFLOPS (Radeon IGP 340M).

Feature	MOBILITY/RADEON 9000	Radeon IGP 340M
G3D Mark Score	4+33%	3
Architecture	TeraScale 2	GCN 5.0
Process Node	40 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	800	3584+348%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.12 TFLOPS	10.75 TFLOPS+860%
ROPs	16	64+300%
TMUs	40	224+460%
L1 Cache	80 KB	896 KB+1020%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	4 MB+1500%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	MOBILITY/RADEON 9000	Radeon IGP 340M
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 and 64-bit on the Radeon IGP 340M. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs 4 MB (Radeon IGP 340M) — the Radeon IGP 340M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	MOBILITY/RADEON 9000	Radeon IGP 340M
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	4 MB+1500%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 draws 10W versus the Radeon IGP 340M's 230W — a 183.3% difference. The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 0W (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs 350W (Radeon IGP 340M). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	MOBILITY/RADEON 9000	Radeon IGP 340M
TDP	10W-96%	230W
Recommended PSU	0W-100%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	—
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	70	—
Perf/Watt	0.4	0.0

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon IGP 340M (2018 vs 2010).

Feature	MOBILITY/RADEON 9000	Radeon IGP 340M
MSRP	$0	—
Codename	Broadway	Vega 10
Release	January 7 2010	August 26 2018
Ranking	#846	#593

Search MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 on Amazon

Search Radeon IGP 340M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.