
MOBILITY RADEON 9000 vs GeForce4 MX 440SE

MOBILITY RADEON 9000
Popular choices:

GeForce4 MX 440SE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The MOBILITY RADEON 9000 is positioned at rank #745 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar MOBILITY RADEON 9000
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce4 MX 440SE is significantly newer (2020 vs 2010). The GeForce4 MX 440SE likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The MOBILITY RADEON 9000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce4 MX 440SE is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 66.7% higher G3D Mark score and 693.7% more VRAM (512 MB vs 65 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the MOBILITY RADEON 9000.
| Insight | MOBILITY RADEON 9000 | GeForce4 MX 440SE |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-66.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+66.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+693.7%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The MOBILITY RADEON 9000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $5 versus $49 for the GeForce4 MX 440SE, it costs 90% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 488% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | MOBILITY RADEON 9000 | GeForce4 MX 440SE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+488%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($5) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of MOBILITY RADEON 9000 and GeForce4 MX 440SE

MOBILITY RADEON 9000
The MOBILITY RADEON 9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.

GeForce4 MX 440SE
The GeForce4 MX 440SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the MOBILITY RADEON 9000 scores 3 versus the GeForce4 MX 440SE's 5 — the GeForce4 MX 440SE leads by 66.7%. The MOBILITY RADEON 9000 is built on TeraScale 2 while the GeForce4 MX 440SE uses Turing, both on 40 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 800 (MOBILITY RADEON 9000) vs 896 (GeForce4 MX 440SE). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON 9000) vs 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce4 MX 440SE).
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 9000 | GeForce4 MX 440SE |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3 | 5+67% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Turing |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 800 | 896+12% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.12 TFLOPS | 3.226 TFLOPS+188% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 40 | 64+60% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 9000 | GeForce4 MX 440SE |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The MOBILITY RADEON 9000 comes with 65 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce4 MX 440SE has 512 MB. The GeForce4 MX 440SE offers 693.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 9000 | GeForce4 MX 440SE |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.063 GB | 0.5 GB+694% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 8.1 (MOBILITY RADEON 9000) vs 7.0 (GeForce4 MX 440SE). OpenGL: 1.4 vs 1.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 1.
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 9000 | GeForce4 MX 440SE |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 8.1+16% | 7.0 |
| OpenGL | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| Max Displays | 3+200% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: MPEG2 (MOBILITY RADEON 9000) vs No (GeForce4 MX 440SE). Decoder: MPEG2 vs No.
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 9000 | GeForce4 MX 440SE |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | MPEG2 | No |
| Decoder | MPEG2 | No |
| Codecs | MPEG2 |
Power & Dimensions
The MOBILITY RADEON 9000 draws 50W versus the GeForce4 MX 440SE's 25W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce4 MX 440SE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (MOBILITY RADEON 9000) vs 350W (GeForce4 MX 440SE). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 60°C.
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 9000 | GeForce4 MX 440SE |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 25W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 165mm |
| Height | — | 100mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | 60°C-14% |
| Perf/Watt | 0.1 | 0.2+100% |
Value Analysis
The MOBILITY RADEON 9000 launched at $50 MSRP and currently averages $5, while the GeForce4 MX 440SE launched at $0 and now averages $49. The MOBILITY RADEON 9000 costs 89.8% less ($44 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.6 (MOBILITY RADEON 9000) vs 0.1 (GeForce4 MX 440SE) — the MOBILITY RADEON 9000 offers 500% better value. The GeForce4 MX 440SE is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2010).
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 9000 | GeForce4 MX 440SE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $5-90% | $49 |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.6+500% | 0.1 |
| Codename | Broadway | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 |
| Release | January 7 2010 | August 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #846 | #523 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















