
MOBILITY/RADEON 9000

Radeon IGP 320M
MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 vs Radeon IGP 320M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 vs Radeon IGP 320M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 vs Radeon IGP 320M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
MOBILITY/RADEON 9000
2010Why buy it
- ✅Draws 10W instead of 85W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Radeon IGP 320M
2019Why buy it
- ✅MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon IGP 320M is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌750% higher power demand at 85W vs 10W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 vs Radeon IGP 320M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

MOBILITY/RADEON 9000
The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

Radeon IGP 320M
The Radeon IGP 320M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1250 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.
Graphics Performance
The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 scores 4 and the Radeon IGP 320M reaches 4 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon IGP 320M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 800 (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs 1,280 (Radeon IGP 320M). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs 3.2 TFLOPS (Radeon IGP 320M).
| Feature | MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 | Radeon IGP 320M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4 | 4 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 800 | 1280+60% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.12 TFLOPS | 3.2 TFLOPS+186% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 40 | 80+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 | Radeon IGP 320M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 and 64-bit on the Radeon IGP 320M. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs 2 MB (Radeon IGP 320M) — the Radeon IGP 320M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 | Radeon IGP 320M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 | Radeon IGP 320M |
|---|---|---|
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: N/A (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs None (Radeon IGP 320M). Decoder: MPEG-2 vs None. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs MPEG-2 (Radeon IGP 320M).
| Feature | MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 | Radeon IGP 320M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | N/A | None |
| Decoder | MPEG-2 | None |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 draws 10W versus the Radeon IGP 320M's 85W — a 157.9% difference. The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 0W (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs 350W (Radeon IGP 320M). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 | Radeon IGP 320M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 10W-88% | 85W |
| Recommended PSU | 0W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 70 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.4 | 0.0 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon IGP 320M (2019 vs 2010).
| Feature | MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 | Radeon IGP 320M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | — |
| Codename | Broadway | Navi 14 |
| Release | January 7 2010 | November 13 2019 |
| Ranking | #846 | #403 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














