MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 vs RADEON IGP 320

AMD

MOBILITY/RADEON 9000

2010Core: 700 MHz
Similar parts
······
VS
AMD

RADEON IGP 320

2021Core: 1825 MHzBoost: 2200 MHz
Similar parts
······

MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 vs RADEON IGP 320 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 vs RADEON IGP 320: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

MOBILITY/RADEON 9000

2010

Why buy it

  • Draws 10W instead of 300W, a 290W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).

RADEON IGP 320

2021

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so RADEON IGP 320 is the less risky modern option long term.
  • More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • 2900% higher power demand at 300W vs 10W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
RADEON IGP 320 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0% in PassMark G3D (4 vs 4), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
RADEON IGP 320 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 7nm process instead of 40nm, 72 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2021 generation instead of 2010. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
RADEON IGP 320 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 vs RADEON IGP 320 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

MOBILITY/RADEON 9000

The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

AMD

RADEON IGP 320

The RADEON IGP 320 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 4 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

Graphics Performance

The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 scores 4 and the RADEON IGP 320 reaches 4 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 is built on TeraScale 2 while the RADEON IGP 320 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 800 (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs 4,608 (RADEON IGP 320). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs 20.28 TFLOPS (RADEON IGP 320).

FeatureMOBILITY/RADEON 9000RADEON IGP 320
G3D Mark Score
4
4
Architecture
TeraScale 2
RDNA 2.0
Process Node
40 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
800
4608+476%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.12 TFLOPS
20.28 TFLOPS+1711%
ROPs
16
128+700%
TMUs
40
288+620%
L1 Cache
0.08 MB
1 MB+1150%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
4 MB+1500%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureMOBILITY/RADEON 9000RADEON IGP 320
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 and 64-bit on the RADEON IGP 320. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs 4 MB (RADEON IGP 320) — the RADEON IGP 320 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureMOBILITY/RADEON 9000RADEON IGP 320
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
4 MB+1500%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 draws 10W versus the RADEON IGP 320's 300W — a 187.1% difference. The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 0W (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs 350W (RADEON IGP 320). Power connectors: None vs Legacy.

FeatureMOBILITY/RADEON 9000RADEON IGP 320
TDP
10W-97%
300W
Recommended PSU
0W-100%
350W
Power Connector
None
Legacy
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
70
Perf/Watt
0.4
0.0
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 came in at $0, while the RADEON IGP 320 launched at $100. On MSRP, MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 was 100+% cheaper ($100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs 0.0 (RADEON IGP 320) — the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 offers 100+% better value. The newer card here is RADEON IGP 320 (2021 vs 2010).

FeatureMOBILITY/RADEON 9000RADEON IGP 320
MSRP
$0-100%
$100
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
0.0
Codename
Broadway
Navi 21
Release
January 7 2010
November 4 2021
Ranking
#846
#136

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.