MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 vs GeForce 6200A

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce 6200A is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0% higher G3D Mark score. However, the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	MOBILITY/RADEON 9000	GeForce 6200A
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0%)	✅Leading raw performance (+0%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+300%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce 6200A remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 Benchmark Check

GeForce 6200A Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 and GeForce 6200A

MOBILITY/RADEON 9000

The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

GeForce 6200A

The GeForce 6200A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 scores 4 and the GeForce 6200A reaches 4 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 is built on TeraScale 2 while the GeForce 6200A uses Maxwell, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 800 (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs 384 (GeForce 6200A). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs 0.7227 TFLOPS (GeForce 6200A).

Feature	MOBILITY/RADEON 9000	GeForce 6200A
G3D Mark Score	4	4
Architecture	TeraScale 2	Maxwell
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	800+108%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.12 TFLOPS+55%	0.7227 TFLOPS
ROPs	16+100%	8
TMUs	40+67%	24
L1 Cache	80 KB	192 KB+140%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	1 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	MOBILITY/RADEON 9000	GeForce 6200A
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 6200A has 128 MB. The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs 1 MB (GeForce 6200A) — the GeForce 6200A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	MOBILITY/RADEON 9000	GeForce 6200A
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB+300%	0.125 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	1 MB+300%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 8.1 (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs 9.0c (GeForce 6200A). Vulkan: N/A vs None. OpenGL: 1.4 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	MOBILITY/RADEON 9000	GeForce 6200A
DirectX	8.1	9.0c+11%
Vulkan	N/A	None
OpenGL	1.4	2.1+50%
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: N/A (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs No (GeForce 6200A). Decoder: MPEG-2 vs PureVideo. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce 6200A).

Feature	MOBILITY/RADEON 9000	GeForce 6200A
Encoder	N/A	No
Decoder	MPEG-2	PureVideo
Codecs	MPEG-2	MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 draws 10W versus the GeForce 6200A's 33W — a 107% difference. The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 0W (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs 350W (GeForce 6200A). Power connectors: None vs Legacy. Card length: 0mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70 vs 65°C.

Feature	MOBILITY/RADEON 9000	GeForce 6200A
TDP	10W-70%	33W
Recommended PSU	0W-100%	350W
Power Connector	None	Legacy
Length	0mm	168mm
Height	0mm	100mm
Slots	0-100%	1
Temp (Load)	70	65°C-7%
Perf/Watt	0.4+300%	0.1

💰

Value Analysis

The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the GeForce 6200A launched at $0 and now averages $0. The GeForce 6200A costs 100+% less ($49 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.1 (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs Infinity (GeForce 6200A) — the GeForce 6200A offers Infinity% better value. The GeForce 6200A is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2010).