MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 vs Radeon VE

AMD

MOBILITY/RADEON 9000

2010Core: 700 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon VE

2019Core: 1400 MHzBoost: 1750 MHz
Similar parts
·······

MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 vs Radeon VE Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 vs Radeon VE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

MOBILITY/RADEON 9000

2010

Why buy it

  • +100% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • Draws 10W instead of 295W, a 285W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon VE

2019

Why buy it

  • MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon VE is the less risky modern option long term.
  • More future proof: GCN 5.1 (2018−2022) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (2 vs 4).
  • Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • 2850% higher power demand at 295W vs 10W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 100% in PassMark G3D (4 vs 2), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon VE is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 7nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2010. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon VE has the stronger long-term case.

MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 vs Radeon VE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

MOBILITY/RADEON 9000

The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

AMD

Radeon VE

The Radeon VE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 7 2019. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1400 MHz to 1750 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2 points. Launch price was $699.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 scores 4 versus the Radeon VE's 2 — the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 leads by 100%. The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon VE uses GCN 5.1, both on 40 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 800 (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs 3,840 (Radeon VE). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs 13.44 TFLOPS (Radeon VE).

FeatureMOBILITY/RADEON 9000Radeon VE
G3D Mark Score
4+100%
2
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GCN 5.1
Process Node
40 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
800
3840+380%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.12 TFLOPS
13.44 TFLOPS+1100%
ROPs
16
64+300%
TMUs
40
240+500%
L1 Cache
80 KB
960 KB+1100%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
4 MB+1500%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureMOBILITY/RADEON 9000Radeon VE
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 and 64-bit on the Radeon VE. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs 4 MB (Radeon VE) — the Radeon VE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureMOBILITY/RADEON 9000Radeon VE
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
4 MB+1500%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 8.1 (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs 7_0 (Radeon VE). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureMOBILITY/RADEON 9000Radeon VE
DirectX
8.1+16%
7_0
Max Displays
2
2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 draws 10W versus the Radeon VE's 295W — a 186.9% difference. The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 0W (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs 350W (Radeon VE). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 165mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.

FeatureMOBILITY/RADEON 9000Radeon VE
TDP
10W-97%
295W
Recommended PSU
0W-100%
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
165mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
70
Perf/Watt
0.4
0.0
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 came in at $0, while the Radeon VE launched at $0. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs Infinity (Radeon VE) — the Radeon VE offers NaN% better value. The newer card here is Radeon VE (2019 vs 2010).

FeatureMOBILITY/RADEON 9000Radeon VE
MSRP
$0
$0
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
Infinity
Codename
Broadway
Vega 20
Release
January 7 2010
February 7 2019
Ranking
#846
#125

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.