GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce4 MX 440SE
GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:
GeForce4 MX 440SE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 157280% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce4 MX 440SE.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce4 MX 440SE |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+157280%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-157280%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+700%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $75 (vs $49), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 102721.6% better value per dollar than the GeForce4 MX 440SE.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce4 MX 440SE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+102721.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($75) | ✅More affordable ($49) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and GeForce4 MX 440SE
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.
GeForce4 MX 440SE
The GeForce4 MX 440SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the GeForce4 MX 440SE's 5 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 157280%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the GeForce4 MX 440SE uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 896 (GeForce4 MX 440SE). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce4 MX 440SE). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1575 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce4 MX 440SE |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,869+157280% | 5 |
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.984 TFLOPS | 3.226 TFLOPS+8% |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+6% | 1575 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 56 | 64+14% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce4 MX 440SE |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce4 MX 440SE has 512 MB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce4 MX 440SE |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+700% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 7.0 (GeForce4 MX 440SE). Vulkan: 1.4 vs None. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 1.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce4 MX 440SE |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12+71% | 7.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | None |
| OpenGL | 4.6+254% | 1.3 |
| Max Displays | 3+200% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs No (GeForce4 MX 440SE). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs No.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce4 MX 440SE |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) | No |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | No |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the GeForce4 MX 440SE's 25W — a 100% difference. The GeForce4 MX 440SE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (GeForce4 MX 440SE). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 165mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 60°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce4 MX 440SE |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 25W-67% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 165mm |
| Height | 111mm | 100mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | 60°C-14% |
| Perf/Watt | 104.9+52350% | 0.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $75, while the GeForce4 MX 440SE launched at $0 and now averages $49. The GeForce4 MX 440SE costs 34.7% less ($26 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.1 (GeForce4 MX 440SE) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 104800% better value. The GeForce4 MX 440SE is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce4 MX 440SE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $75 | $49-35% |
| Performance per Dollar | 104.9+104800% | 0.1 |
| Codename | TU117 | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 |
| Release | April 23 2019 | August 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #323 | #523 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 1650 and GeForce4 MX 440SE
