GeForce RTX 3050 8GB vs GeForce4 MX 4000
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Popular choices:
GeForce4 MX 4000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 250600% higher G3D Mark score and 1500% more VRAM (8 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce4 MX 4000.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | GeForce4 MX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+250600%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-250600%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $209 (vs $49), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 58676.6% better value per dollar than the GeForce4 MX 4000.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | GeForce4 MX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+58676.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($209) | ✅More affordable ($49) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 8GB and GeForce4 MX 4000
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1552 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,535 points. Launch price was $249.
GeForce4 MX 4000
The GeForce4 MX 4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB scores 12,535 versus the GeForce4 MX 4000's 5 — the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB leads by 250600%. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is built on Ampere while the GeForce4 MX 4000 uses Turing, both on 8 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 896 (GeForce4 MX 4000). Raw compute: 9.098 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce4 MX 4000). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 1575 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | GeForce4 MX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,535+250600% | 5 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+186% | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 9.098 TFLOPS+182% | 3.226 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1777 MHz+13% | 1575 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 80+25% | 64 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The GeForce4 MX 4000 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | GeForce4 MX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce4 MX 4000 has 512 MB. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers 1500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | GeForce4 MX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+1500% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 7.0 (GeForce4 MX 4000). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 1.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | GeForce4 MX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate+71% | 7.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+207% | 1.5 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs None (GeForce4 MX 4000). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs MPEG-2 Decoder. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce4 MX 4000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | GeForce4 MX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | None |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | MPEG-2 Decoder |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB draws 130W versus the GeForce4 MX 4000's 25W — a 135.5% difference. The GeForce4 MX 4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 350W (GeForce4 MX 4000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 66°C vs 60°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | GeForce4 MX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 25W-81% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 350W-22% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 168mm |
| Height | 112mm | 100mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 66°C | 60°C-9% |
| Perf/Watt | 96.4+48100% | 0.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB launched at $249 MSRP and currently averages $209, while the GeForce4 MX 4000 launched at $0 and now averages $49. The GeForce4 MX 4000 costs 76.6% less ($160 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 60.0 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 0.1 (GeForce4 MX 4000) — the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers 59900% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | GeForce4 MX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $209 | $49-77% |
| Performance per Dollar | 60.0+59900% | 0.1 |
| Codename | GA106 | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | August 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #211 | #523 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 3050 8GB and GeForce4 MX 4000
