GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Radeon Pro 5700 XT
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB vs Radeon Pro 5700 XT Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB vs Radeon Pro 5700 XT FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB vs Radeon Pro 5700 XT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
2022Why buy it
- ✅3.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $251 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 102.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.3 vs 24.9 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Radeon Pro 5700 XT
2020Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 8GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌100.8% HIGHER MSRP$500 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 24.9 vs 50.3 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB vs Radeon Pro 5700 XT Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1552 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,535 points. Launch price was $249.
Radeon Pro 5700 XT
The Radeon Pro 5700 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1499 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,442 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB scores 12,535 and the Radeon Pro 5700 XT reaches 12,442 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is built on Ampere while the Radeon Pro 5700 XT uses RDNA 1.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 2,560 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Raw compute: 9.098 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 7.675 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 1499 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,535 | 12,442 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 9.098 TFLOPS+19% | 7.675 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1777 MHz+19% | 1499 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 80 | 160+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 5700 XT carries 16 GB. Radeon Pro 5700 XT gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro 5700 XT. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) — the Radeon Pro 5700 XT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs RDNA 1.0 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs Unified Video Decoder 7.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | RDNA 1.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | Unified Video Decoder 7.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB draws 130W versus the Radeon Pro 5700 XT's 130W — a 0% difference. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 500W (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 66°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-10% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | — |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 66°C-12% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 96.4 | 95.7 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB came in at $249, while the Radeon Pro 5700 XT launched at $500. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3050 8GB was 50.2% cheaper ($251 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.3 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 24.9 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) — the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers 102% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 8GB (2022 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-50% | $500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.3+102% | 24.9 |
| Codename | GA106 | Navi 10 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | August 4 2020 |
| Ranking | #211 | #215 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 3050 8GB and Radeon Pro 5700 XT
