
GeForce GTX TITAN X

GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
GeForce GTX TITAN X vs GeForce RTX 3050 8GB Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX TITAN X vs GeForce RTX 3050 8GB FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX TITAN X vs GeForce RTX 3050 8GB: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX TITAN X
2015Why buy it
- ✅3.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌2015 hardware with 12 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌301.2% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.6 vs 50.3 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 130W.
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $750 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 298.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.3 vs 12.6 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 250W, a 120W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX TITAN X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX TITAN X vs GeForce RTX 3050 8GB Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX TITAN X
The GeForce GTX TITAN X is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 17 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1075 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,621 points. Launch price was $999.

GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1552 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,535 points. Launch price was $249.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX TITAN X scores 12,621 and the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB reaches 12,535 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX TITAN X is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Raw compute: 6.691 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 9.098 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Boost clocks: 1075 MHz vs 1777 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,621 | 12,535 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+20% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.691 TFLOPS | 9.098 TFLOPS+36% |
| Boost Clock | 1075 MHz | 1777 MHz+65% |
| ROPs | 96+200% | 32 |
| TMUs | 192+140% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 1.1 MB | 2.5 MB+127% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX TITAN X is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX TITAN X has 12 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB carries 8 GB. GeForce GTX TITAN X gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) — a 50% advantage for the GeForce GTX TITAN X. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the GeForce GTX TITAN X and 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) — the GeForce GTX TITAN X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+50% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s+50% | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+200% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL 12_1) (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL 12_1) | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 2nd gen (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Decoder: NVDEC 2nd gen vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB).
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 2nd gen | NVENC 7th gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 2nd gen | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX TITAN X draws 250W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB's 130W — a 63.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 242mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 83°C vs 66°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 130W-48% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 450W-25% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 242mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 83°C | 66°C-20% |
| Perf/Watt | 50.5 | 96.4+91% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX TITAN X came in at $999, while the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB launched at $249. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3050 8GB was 75.1% cheaper ($750 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.6 (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 50.3 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers 299.2% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 8GB (2022 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999 | $249-75% |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.6 | 50.3+299% |
| Codename | GM200 | GA106 |
| Release | March 17 2015 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #209 | #211 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















