Arc A750
GeForce GTX TITAN X
Arc A750 vs GeForce GTX TITAN X Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Arc A750 vs GeForce GTX TITAN X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Arc A750 vs GeForce GTX TITAN X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Arc A750
2022Why buy it
- ✅18.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $710 less on MSRP ($289 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 245.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 43.6 vs 12.6 G3D/$ ($289 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
GeForce GTX TITAN X
2015Why buy it
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Arc A750 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2015 hardware with 12 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌245.7% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$289 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.6 vs 43.6 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Arc A750 vs GeForce GTX TITAN X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Arc A750
The Arc A750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2050 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,600 points. Launch price was $289.
GeForce GTX TITAN X
The GeForce GTX TITAN X is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 17 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1075 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,621 points. Launch price was $999.
Graphics Performance
The Arc A750 scores 12,600 and the GeForce GTX TITAN X reaches 12,621 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A750 is built on Generation 12.7 while the GeForce GTX TITAN X uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 6 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Arc A750) vs 3,072 (GeForce GTX TITAN X). Raw compute: 17.2 TFLOPS (Arc A750) vs 6.691 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX TITAN X). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 1075 MHz.
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce GTX TITAN X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,600 | 12,621 |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+17% | 3072 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 17.2 TFLOPS+157% | 6.691 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2400 MHz+123% | 1075 MHz |
| ROPs | 112+17% | 96 |
| TMUs | 224+17% | 192 |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB+433% | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX TITAN X gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Arc A750 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce GTX TITAN X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc A750 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX TITAN X carries 12 GB. GeForce GTX TITAN X gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 512 GB/s (Arc A750) vs 336 GB/s (GeForce GTX TITAN X) — a 52.4% advantage for the Arc A750. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Arc A750 and 384-bit on the GeForce GTX TITAN X. L2 Cache: 16 MB (Arc A750) vs 3 MB (GeForce GTX TITAN X) — the Arc A750 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce GTX TITAN X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 12 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 512 GB/s+52% | 336 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 384-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB+433% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A750) vs 12 (FL 12_1) (GeForce GTX TITAN X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce GTX TITAN X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 (FL 12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Dual Xe Media Engine (Arc A750) vs NVENC 2nd gen (GeForce GTX TITAN X). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs NVDEC 2nd gen. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Arc A750) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX TITAN X).
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce GTX TITAN X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Dual Xe Media Engine | NVENC 2nd gen |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | NVDEC 2nd gen |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc A750 draws 225W versus the GeForce GTX TITAN X's 250W — a 10.5% difference. The Arc A750 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Arc A750) vs 600W (GeForce GTX TITAN X). Power connectors: 8-pin + 6-pin vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 268mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 78°C vs 83°C.
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce GTX TITAN X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W-10% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 600W-8% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin + 6-pin | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 268mm | 267mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 78°C-6% | 83°C |
| Perf/Watt | 56.0+11% | 50.5 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Arc A750 came in at $289, while the GeForce GTX TITAN X launched at $999. On MSRP, Arc A750 was 71.1% cheaper ($710 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 43.6 (Arc A750) vs 12.6 (GeForce GTX TITAN X) — the Arc A750 offers 246% better value. The newer card here is Arc A750 (2022 vs 2015).
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce GTX TITAN X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $289-71% | $999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 43.6+246% | 12.6 |
| Codename | DG2-512 | GM200 |
| Release | October 12 2022 | March 17 2015 |
| Ranking | #212 | #209 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc A750 and GeForce GTX TITAN X
