Arc A750 vs GeForce GTX TITAN X
Arc A750
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX TITAN X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Arc A750
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Arc A750 is significantly newer (2022 vs 2015). The Arc A750 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX TITAN X lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX TITAN X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (12 GB vs 8 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Arc A750.
| Insight | Arc A750 | GeForce GTX TITAN X |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.2%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) / 6nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ✅ More VRAM (+50%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (268mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX TITAN X offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $120 versus $229 for the Arc A750, it costs 48% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 91.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Arc A750 | GeForce GTX TITAN X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+91.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($229) | ✅More affordable ($120) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc A750 and GeForce GTX TITAN X
Arc A750
The Arc A750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2050 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,600 points. Launch price was $289.
GeForce GTX TITAN X
The GeForce GTX TITAN X is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 17 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1075 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,621 points. Launch price was $999.
Graphics Performance
The Arc A750 scores 12,600 and the GeForce GTX TITAN X reaches 12,621 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A750 is built on Generation 12.7 while the GeForce GTX TITAN X uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 6 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Arc A750) vs 3,072 (GeForce GTX TITAN X). Raw compute: 17.2 TFLOPS (Arc A750) vs 6.691 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX TITAN X). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 1075 MHz.
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce GTX TITAN X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,600 | 12,621 |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+17% | 3072 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 17.2 TFLOPS+157% | 6.691 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2400 MHz+123% | 1075 MHz |
| ROPs | 112+17% | 96 |
| TMUs | 224+17% | 192 |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB+433% | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce GTX TITAN X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc A750 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX TITAN X has 12 GB. The GeForce GTX TITAN X offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 512 GB/s (Arc A750) vs 336 GB/s (GeForce GTX TITAN X) — a 52.4% advantage for the Arc A750. Bus width: 256-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 16 MB (Arc A750) vs 3 MB (GeForce GTX TITAN X) — the Arc A750 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce GTX TITAN X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 12 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 512 GB/s+52% | 336 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 384-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB+433% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A750) vs 12 (FL 12_1) (GeForce GTX TITAN X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce GTX TITAN X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 (FL 12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Dual Xe Media Engine (Arc A750) vs NVENC 2nd gen (GeForce GTX TITAN X). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs NVDEC 2nd gen. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Arc A750) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX TITAN X).
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce GTX TITAN X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Dual Xe Media Engine | NVENC 2nd gen |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | NVDEC 2nd gen |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc A750 draws 225W versus the GeForce GTX TITAN X's 250W — a 10.5% difference. The Arc A750 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Arc A750) vs 600W (GeForce GTX TITAN X). Power connectors: 8-pin + 6-pin vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 268mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 78°C vs 83°C.
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce GTX TITAN X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W-10% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 600W-8% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin + 6-pin | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 268mm | 267mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 78°C-6% | 83°C |
| Perf/Watt | 56.0+11% | 50.5 |
Value Analysis
The Arc A750 launched at $289 MSRP and currently averages $229, while the GeForce GTX TITAN X launched at $999 and now averages $120. The GeForce GTX TITAN X costs 47.6% less ($109 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 55.0 (Arc A750) vs 105.2 (GeForce GTX TITAN X) — the GeForce GTX TITAN X offers 91.3% better value. The Arc A750 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2015).
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce GTX TITAN X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $289-71% | $999 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $229 | $120-48% |
| Performance per Dollar | 55.0 | 105.2+91% |
| Codename | DG2-512 | GM200 |
| Release | October 12 2022 | March 17 2015 |
| Ranking | #212 | #209 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc A750 and GeForce GTX TITAN X
