Arc A750 vs Radeon Pro WX 8200

CPU

GPU

Arc A750

2022Core: 2050 MHzBoost: 2400 MHz

Arc family

···

Buy on Amazon

Radeon Pro WX 8200

2018Core: 1200 MHzBoost: 1500 MHz

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Arc A750 vs Radeon Pro WX 8200 Performance Spectrum

Arc A750

8 GB 225

12,600

0.0%

Arc 8-Core iGPU

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)

12,615

+0.1%

Radeon RX 470 (móvel)

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc A750 vs Radeon Pro WX 8200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Arc A750 vs Radeon Pro WX 8200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc A750

2022

Why buy it

✅12.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $710 less on MSRP ($289 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 245.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 43.6 vs 12.6 G3D/$ ($289 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Better long-term bet: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Radeon Pro WX 8200

2018

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Arc A750 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌
245.7% HIGHER MSRP
$999 MSRPvs$289 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.6 vs 43.6 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Arc A750 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 12.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon Pro WX 8200 instead at 12,615 vs 12,600, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Arc A750 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 6nm process instead of 14nm, 28 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2018. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Arc A750 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $710 cheaper on MSRP at $289 vs $999, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 245.3% (43.6 vs 12.6), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Arc A750 vs Radeon Pro WX 8200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Arc A750

The Arc A750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2050 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,600 points. Launch price was $289.

Radeon Pro WX 8200

The Radeon Pro WX 8200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,615 points. Launch price was $999.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Arc A750 scores 12,600 and the Radeon Pro WX 8200 reaches 12,615 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A750 is built on Generation 12.7 while the Radeon Pro WX 8200 uses GCN 5.0, both on 6 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Arc A750) vs 3,584 (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Raw compute: 17.2 TFLOPS (Arc A750) vs 10.75 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 1500 MHz.

Feature	Arc A750	Radeon Pro WX 8200
G3D Mark Score	12,600	12,615
Architecture	Generation 12.7	GCN 5.0
Process Node	6 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	3584	3584
Compute (TFLOPS)	17.2 TFLOPS+60%	10.75 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2400 MHz+60%	1500 MHz
ROPs	112+75%	64
TMUs	224	224
L2 Cache	16 MB+300%	4 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Arc A750	Radeon Pro WX 8200
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Arc A750 and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro WX 8200. L2 Cache: 16 MB (Arc A750) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro WX 8200) — the Arc A750 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Arc A750	Radeon Pro WX 8200
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	16 MB+300%	4 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A750) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Arc A750	Radeon Pro WX 8200
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.1
Vulkan	1.3+18%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Dual Xe Media Engine (Arc A750) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Arc A750) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro WX 8200).

Feature	Arc A750	Radeon Pro WX 8200
Encoder	Dual Xe Media Engine	VCE 4.0
Decoder	Xe Media Engine	UVD 7.0
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A750 draws 225W versus the Radeon Pro WX 8200's 230W — a 2.2% difference. The Arc A750 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Arc A750) vs 500W (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Power connectors: 8-pin + 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 268mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 78°C vs 80°C.

Feature	Arc A750	Radeon Pro WX 8200
TDP	225W-2%	230W
Recommended PSU	650W	500W-23%
Power Connector	8-pin + 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	268mm	267mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	78°C-3%	80°C
Perf/Watt	56.0+2%	54.8

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Arc A750 came in at $289, while the Radeon Pro WX 8200 launched at $999. On MSRP, Arc A750 was 71.1% cheaper ($710 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 43.6 (Arc A750) vs 12.6 (Radeon Pro WX 8200) — the Arc A750 offers 246% better value. The newer card here is Arc A750 (2022 vs 2018).

Feature	Arc A750	Radeon Pro WX 8200
MSRP	$289-71%	$999
Performance per Dollar	43.6+246%	12.6
Codename	DG2-512	Vega 10
Release	October 12 2022	August 13 2018
Ranking	#212	#210

Search Arc A750 on Amazon

Search Radeon Pro WX 8200 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.