CPU
GPU
Arc A750
Popular choices:
Radeon Pro WX 8200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Arc A750
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 8200
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro WX 8200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Arc A750.
| Insight | Arc A750 | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.1%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) / 6nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (268mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Arc A750 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $229 versus $350 for the Radeon Pro WX 8200, it costs 35% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 52.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Arc A750 | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+52.7%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($229) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($350) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc A750 and Radeon Pro WX 8200
Arc A750
The Arc A750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2050 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,600 points. Launch price was $289.
Radeon Pro WX 8200
The Radeon Pro WX 8200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,615 points. Launch price was $999.
Graphics Performance
The Arc A750 scores 12,600 and the Radeon Pro WX 8200 reaches 12,615 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A750 is built on Generation 12.7 while the Radeon Pro WX 8200 uses GCN 5.0, both on 6 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Arc A750) vs 3,584 (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Raw compute: 17.2 TFLOPS (Arc A750) vs 10.75 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 1500 MHz.
| Feature | Arc A750 | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,600 | 12,615 |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584 | 3584 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 17.2 TFLOPS+60% | 10.75 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2400 MHz+60% | 1500 MHz |
| ROPs | 112+75% | 64 |
| TMUs | 224 | 224 |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB+300% | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc A750 | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 16 MB (Arc A750) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro WX 8200) — the Arc A750 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc A750 | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB+300% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A750) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc A750 | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Dual Xe Media Engine (Arc A750) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Arc A750) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro WX 8200).
| Feature | Arc A750 | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Dual Xe Media Engine | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc A750 draws 225W versus the Radeon Pro WX 8200's 230W — a 2.2% difference. The Arc A750 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Arc A750) vs 500W (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Power connectors: 8-pin + 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 268mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 78°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Arc A750 | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W-2% | 230W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 500W-23% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin + 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 268mm | 267mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 78°C-3% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 56.0+2% | 54.8 |
Value Analysis
The Arc A750 launched at $289 MSRP and currently averages $229, while the Radeon Pro WX 8200 launched at $999 and now averages $350. The Arc A750 costs 34.6% less ($121 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 55.0 (Arc A750) vs 36.0 (Radeon Pro WX 8200) — the Arc A750 offers 52.8% better value. The Arc A750 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2018).
| Feature | Arc A750 | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $289-71% | $999 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $229-35% | $350 |
| Performance per Dollar | 55.0+53% | 36.0 |
| Codename | DG2-512 | Vega 10 |
| Release | October 12 2022 | August 13 2018 |
| Ranking | #212 | #210 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc A750 and Radeon Pro WX 8200
