CPU
GPU
Arc A750
Popular choices:
Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Arc A750
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Arc A750 uses modern memory architecture. The Arc A750 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon Vega Frontier Edition lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Vega Frontier Edition is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Arc A750 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Arc A750 | Radeon Vega Frontier Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.2%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) / 6nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (268mm) | Standard Size (268mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon Vega Frontier Edition offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $150 versus $229 for the Arc A750, it costs 34% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 54.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Arc A750 | Radeon Vega Frontier Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+54.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($229) | ✅More affordable ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc A750 and Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
Arc A750
The Arc A750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2050 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,600 points. Launch price was $289.
Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
The Radeon Vega Frontier Edition is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1382 MHz to 1600 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,753 points. Launch price was $999.
Graphics Performance
The Arc A750 scores 12,600 and the Radeon Vega Frontier Edition reaches 12,753 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A750 is built on Generation 12.7 while the Radeon Vega Frontier Edition uses GCN 5.0, both on 6 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Arc A750) vs 4,096 (Radeon Vega Frontier Edition). Raw compute: 17.2 TFLOPS (Arc A750) vs 13.11 TFLOPS (Radeon Vega Frontier Edition). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 1600 MHz.
| Feature | Arc A750 | Radeon Vega Frontier Edition |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,600 | 12,753+1% |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584 | 4096+14% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 17.2 TFLOPS+31% | 13.11 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2400 MHz+50% | 1600 MHz |
| ROPs | 112+75% | 64 |
| TMUs | 224 | 256+14% |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB+300% | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc A750 | Radeon Vega Frontier Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc A750 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Vega Frontier Edition has 0 MB. The Arc A750 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 16 MB (Arc A750) vs 4 MB (Radeon Vega Frontier Edition) — the Arc A750 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc A750 | Radeon Vega Frontier Edition |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 512 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB+300% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A750) vs 12.1 (Radeon Vega Frontier Edition). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc A750 | Radeon Vega Frontier Edition |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Dual Xe Media Engine (Arc A750) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Vega Frontier Edition). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Arc A750) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Vega Frontier Edition).
| Feature | Arc A750 | Radeon Vega Frontier Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Dual Xe Media Engine | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc A750 draws 225W versus the Radeon Vega Frontier Edition's 300W — a 28.6% difference. The Arc A750 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Arc A750) vs 1W (Radeon Vega Frontier Edition). Power connectors: 8-pin + 6-pin vs Integrated. Card length: 268mm vs 268mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 78°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Arc A750 | Radeon Vega Frontier Edition |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W-25% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin + 6-pin | Integrated |
| Length | 268mm | 268mm |
| Height | — | 105mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 78°C-8% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 56.0+32% | 42.5 |
Value Analysis
The Arc A750 launched at $289 MSRP and currently averages $229, while the Radeon Vega Frontier Edition launched at $999 and now averages $150. The Radeon Vega Frontier Edition costs 34.5% less ($79 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 55.0 (Arc A750) vs 85.0 (Radeon Vega Frontier Edition) — the Radeon Vega Frontier Edition offers 54.5% better value. The Arc A750 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2017).
| Feature | Arc A750 | Radeon Vega Frontier Edition |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $289-71% | $999 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $229 | $150-34% |
| Performance per Dollar | 55.0 | 85.0+55% |
| Codename | DG2-512 | Vega 10 |
| Release | October 12 2022 | June 27 2017 |
| Ranking | #212 | #203 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc A750 and Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
