
Arc A750

Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
Arc A750 vs Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Arc A750 vs Radeon Vega Frontier Edition FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Arc A750 vs Radeon Vega Frontier Edition: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Arc A750
2022Why buy it
- ✅28.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $710 less on MSRP ($289 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 241.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 43.6 vs 12.8 G3D/$ ($289 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
2017Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Arc A750 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2017 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌245.7% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$289 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.8 vs 43.6 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Arc A750 vs Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Arc A750
The Arc A750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2050 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,600 points. Launch price was $289.

Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
The Radeon Vega Frontier Edition is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1382 MHz to 1600 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,753 points. Launch price was $999.
Graphics Performance
The Arc A750 scores 12,600 and the Radeon Vega Frontier Edition reaches 12,753 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A750 is built on Generation 12.7 while the Radeon Vega Frontier Edition uses GCN 5.0, both on 6 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Arc A750) vs 4,096 (Radeon Vega Frontier Edition). Raw compute: 17.2 TFLOPS (Arc A750) vs 13.11 TFLOPS (Radeon Vega Frontier Edition). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 1600 MHz.
| Feature | Arc A750 | Radeon Vega Frontier Edition |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,600 | 12,753+1% |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584 | 4096+14% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 17.2 TFLOPS+31% | 13.11 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2400 MHz+50% | 1600 MHz |
| ROPs | 112+75% | 64 |
| TMUs | 224 | 256+14% |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB+300% | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc A750 | Radeon Vega Frontier Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc A750 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Vega Frontier Edition carries 0 MB. Arc A750 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Arc A750 and System on the Radeon Vega Frontier Edition. L2 Cache: 16 MB (Arc A750) vs 4 MB (Radeon Vega Frontier Edition) — the Arc A750 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc A750 | Radeon Vega Frontier Edition |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 512 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB+300% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A750) vs 12.1 (Radeon Vega Frontier Edition). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc A750 | Radeon Vega Frontier Edition |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Dual Xe Media Engine (Arc A750) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Vega Frontier Edition). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Arc A750) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Vega Frontier Edition).
| Feature | Arc A750 | Radeon Vega Frontier Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Dual Xe Media Engine | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc A750 draws 225W versus the Radeon Vega Frontier Edition's 300W — a 28.6% difference. The Arc A750 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Arc A750) vs 1W (Radeon Vega Frontier Edition). Power connectors: 8-pin + 6-pin vs Integrated. Card length: 268mm vs 268mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 78°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Arc A750 | Radeon Vega Frontier Edition |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W-25% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin + 6-pin | Integrated |
| Length | 268mm | 268mm |
| Height | — | 105mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 78°C-8% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 56.0+32% | 42.5 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Arc A750 came in at $289, while the Radeon Vega Frontier Edition launched at $999. On MSRP, Arc A750 was 71.1% cheaper ($710 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 43.6 (Arc A750) vs 12.8 (Radeon Vega Frontier Edition) — the Arc A750 offers 240.6% better value. The newer card here is Arc A750 (2022 vs 2017).
| Feature | Arc A750 | Radeon Vega Frontier Edition |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $289-71% | $999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 43.6+241% | 12.8 |
| Codename | DG2-512 | Vega 10 |
| Release | October 12 2022 | June 27 2017 |
| Ranking | #212 | #203 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















