Arc A750 vs Radeon RX 5700M
Arc A750
Popular choices:
Radeon RX 5700M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Arc A750
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 5700M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 5700M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Arc A750.
| Insight | Arc A750 | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) / 6nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) / 7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (268mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon RX 5700M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc A750 and Radeon RX 5700M
Arc A750
The Arc A750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2050 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,600 points. Launch price was $289.
Radeon RX 5700M
The Radeon RX 5700M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1465 MHz to 1720 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,669 points.
Graphics Performance
The Arc A750 scores 12,600 and the Radeon RX 5700M reaches 12,669 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A750 is built on Generation 12.7 while the Radeon RX 5700M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 6 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Arc A750) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 5700M). Raw compute: 17.2 TFLOPS (Arc A750) vs 7.926 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5700M). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 1720 MHz.
| Feature | Arc A750 | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,600 | 12,669 |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+56% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 17.2 TFLOPS+117% | 7.926 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2400 MHz+40% | 1720 MHz |
| ROPs | 112+75% | 64 |
| TMUs | 224+56% | 144 |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB+100% | 8 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc A750 | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | FSR 2.1 |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 512 GB/s (Arc A750) vs 384 GB/s (Radeon RX 5700M) — a 33.3% advantage for the Arc A750. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 16 MB (Arc A750) vs 8 MB (Radeon RX 5700M) — the Arc A750 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc A750 | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 512 GB/s+33% | 384 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB+100% | 8 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A750) vs 12.1 (Radeon RX 5700M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc A750 | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Dual Xe Media Engine (Arc A750) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5700M). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Arc A750) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5700M).
| Feature | Arc A750 | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Dual Xe Media Engine | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc A750 draws 225W versus the Radeon RX 5700M's 180W — a 22.2% difference. The Radeon RX 5700M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Arc A750) vs 500W (Radeon RX 5700M). Power connectors: 8-pin + 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 268mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 78°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Arc A750 | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 180W-20% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 500W-23% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin + 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 268mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 78°C-8% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 56.0 | 70.4+26% |
Value Analysis
The Arc A750 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2020).
| Feature | Arc A750 | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $289 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $229 | — |
| Codename | DG2-512 | Navi 10 |
| Release | October 12 2022 | March 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #212 | #751 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc A750 and Radeon RX 5700M
