Arc A750 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

CPU

GPU

Arc A750

2022Core: 2050 MHzBoost: 2400 MHz

Arc family

···

Buy on Amazon

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

2019Core: 1500 MHzBoost: 1770 MHz

GTX family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Arc A750 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Performance Spectrum

Arc A750

8 GB 225

12,600

0.0%

Arc 8-Core iGPU

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)

12,747

+1.2%

GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)

GeForce GTX Titan

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile

GeForce RTX 2070

GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB

GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (móvel)

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc A750 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Arc A750 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc A750

2022

Why buy it

✅25.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
✅Better long-term bet: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌
3.6% HIGHER MSRP
$289 MSRPvs$279 MSRP
❌87.5% higher power demand at 225W vs 120W.
❌17% longer card at 268mm vs 229mm.

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $10 less on MSRP ($279 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).
✅Draws 120W instead of 225W, a 105W reduction.
✅Measures 229mm instead of 268mm, a 39mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Arc A750 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Arc A750 is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Arc A750 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 25.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GTX 1660 Ti instead at 12,747 vs 12,600, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Arc A750 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 6 GB of VRAM, a 6nm process instead of 12nm, 28 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2019. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti makes the most sense to buy today. It is $10 cheaper on MSRP at $279 vs $289, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 4.8% (45.7 vs 43.6), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and lighter 1440p, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and lighter 1440p headroom, Arc A750 has the stronger long-term case.

Arc A750 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Arc A750

The Arc A750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2050 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,600 points. Launch price was $289.

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,747 points. Launch price was $279.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Arc A750 scores 12,600 and the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti reaches 12,747 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A750 is built on Generation 12.7 while the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti uses Turing, both on 6 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Arc A750) vs 1,536 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti). Raw compute: 17.2 TFLOPS (Arc A750) vs 5.437 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 1770 MHz.

Feature	Arc A750	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
G3D Mark Score	12,600	12,747+1%
Architecture	Generation 12.7	Turing
Process Node	6 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	3584+133%	1536
Compute (TFLOPS)	17.2 TFLOPS+216%	5.437 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2400 MHz+36%	1770 MHz
ROPs	112+133%	48
TMUs	224+133%	96
L2 Cache	16 MB+967%	1.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Arc A750 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	Arc A750	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc A750 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti carries 6 GB. Arc A750 gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 512 GB/s (Arc A750) vs 288 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) — a 77.8% advantage for the Arc A750. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Arc A750 and 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti. L2 Cache: 16 MB (Arc A750) vs 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) — the Arc A750 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Arc A750	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+33%	6 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	512 GB/s+78%	288 GB/s
Bus Width	256-bit+33%	192-bit
L2 Cache	16 MB+967%	1.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A750) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Arc A750	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12
Vulkan	1.3	1.4+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Dual Xe Media Engine (Arc A750) vs NVENC 7th gen (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Arc A750) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti).

Feature	Arc A750	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Encoder	Dual Xe Media Engine	NVENC 7th gen
Decoder	Xe Media Engine	NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A750 draws 225W versus the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti's 120W — a 60.9% difference. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Arc A750) vs 450W (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti). Power connectors: 8-pin + 6-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 268mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 78°C vs 75°C.

Feature	Arc A750	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
TDP	225W	120W-47%
Recommended PSU	650W	450W-31%
Power Connector	8-pin + 6-pin	8-pin
Length	268mm	229mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	78°C	75°C-4%
Perf/Watt	56.0	106.2+90%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Arc A750 came in at $289, while the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti launched at $279. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti was 3.5% cheaper ($10 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 43.6 (Arc A750) vs 45.7 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti offers 4.8% better value. The newer card here is Arc A750 (2022 vs 2019).

Feature	Arc A750	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
MSRP	$289	$279-3%
Performance per Dollar	43.6	45.7+5%
Codename	DG2-512	TU116
Release	October 12 2022	February 22 2019
Ranking	#212	#204

Search Arc A750 on Amazon

Search GeForce GTX 1660 Ti on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.