Arc A750 vs Quadro P5000

CPU

GPU

Arc A750

2022Core: 2050 MHzBoost: 2400 MHz

Arc family

···

Buy on Amazon

Quadro P5000

2016Core: 1607 MHzBoost: 1733 MHz

Similar parts

···

Buy on Amazon

Arc A750 vs Quadro P5000 Performance Spectrum

Arc A750

8 GB 225

12,600

0.0%

Arc 8-Core iGPU

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)

12,728

+1.0%

GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)

GeForce GTX Titan

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile

GeForce RTX 2070

GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB

GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (móvel)

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc A750 vs Quadro P5000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Arc A750 vs Quadro P5000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc A750

2022

Why buy it

✅7.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $2,210 less on MSRP ($289 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 756% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 43.6 vs 5.1 G3D/$ ($289 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
✅Better long-term bet: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌25% higher power demand at 225W vs 180W.

Quadro P5000

2016

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
✅Draws 180W instead of 225W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Arc A750 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2016 hardware with 16 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌
764.7% HIGHER MSRP
$2,499 MSRPvs$289 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.1 vs 43.6 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Arc A750 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 7.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro P5000 instead at 12,728 vs 12,600, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Arc A750 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 6nm process instead of 16nm, 28 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2016. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Arc A750 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,210 cheaper on MSRP at $289 vs $2,499, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 756% (43.6 vs 5.1), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Arc A750 vs Quadro P5000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Arc A750

The Arc A750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2050 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,600 points. Launch price was $289.

Quadro P5000

The Quadro P5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,728 points. Launch price was $2,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Arc A750 scores 12,600 and the Quadro P5000 reaches 12,728 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A750 is built on Generation 12.7 while the Quadro P5000 uses Pascal, both on 6 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Arc A750) vs 2,048 (Quadro P5000). Raw compute: 17.2 TFLOPS (Arc A750) vs 8.873 TFLOPS (Quadro P5000). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 1733 MHz.

Feature	Arc A750	Quadro P5000
G3D Mark Score	12,600	12,728+1%
Architecture	Generation 12.7	Pascal
Process Node	6 nm	16 nm
Shading Units	3584+75%	2048
Compute (TFLOPS)	17.2 TFLOPS+94%	8.873 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2400 MHz+38%	1733 MHz
ROPs	112+75%	64
TMUs	224+40%	160
L2 Cache	16 MB+700%	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Arc A750	Quadro P5000
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc A750 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P5000 carries 16 GB. Quadro P5000 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 512 GB/s (Arc A750) vs 288 GB/s (Quadro P5000) — a 77.8% advantage for the Arc A750. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Arc A750 and 256-bit on the Quadro P5000. L2 Cache: 16 MB (Arc A750) vs 2 MB (Quadro P5000) — the Arc A750 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Arc A750	Quadro P5000
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	16 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5X
Memory Bandwidth	512 GB/s+78%	288 GB/s
Bus Width	256-bit	256-bit
L2 Cache	16 MB+700%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A750) vs 12.1 (Quadro P5000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.0. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Arc A750	Quadro P5000
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.1
Vulkan	1.3+30%	1.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Dual Xe Media Engine (Arc A750) vs 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P5000). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs 3rd Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Arc A750) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P5000).

Feature	Arc A750	Quadro P5000
Encoder	Dual Xe Media Engine	6th Gen NVENC
Decoder	Xe Media Engine	3rd Gen NVDEC
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A750 draws 225W versus the Quadro P5000's 180W — a 22.2% difference. The Quadro P5000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Arc A750) vs 500W (Quadro P5000). Power connectors: 8-pin + 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 268mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 78°C vs 80°C.

Feature	Arc A750	Quadro P5000
TDP	225W	180W-20%
Recommended PSU	650W	500W-23%
Power Connector	8-pin + 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	268mm	267mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	78°C-3%	80°C
Perf/Watt	56.0	70.7+26%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Arc A750 came in at $289, while the Quadro P5000 launched at $2499. On MSRP, Arc A750 was 88.4% cheaper ($2210 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 43.6 (Arc A750) vs 5.1 (Quadro P5000) — the Arc A750 offers 754.9% better value. The newer card here is Arc A750 (2022 vs 2016).

Feature	Arc A750	Quadro P5000
MSRP	$289-88%	$2499
Performance per Dollar	43.6+755%	5.1
Codename	DG2-512	GP104
Release	October 12 2022	October 1 2016
Ranking	#212	#206

Search Arc A750 on Amazon

Search Quadro P5000 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.