Arc A750 vs GeForce RTX 3070
Arc A750
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Arc A750
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3070
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 76% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Arc A750.
| Insight | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-76%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+76%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) / 6nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (268mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3070 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $200 versus $229 for the Arc A750, it costs 13% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 101.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+101.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($229) | ✅More affordable ($200) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc A750 and GeForce RTX 3070
Arc A750
The Arc A750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2050 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,600 points. Launch price was $289.
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Arc A750 scores 12,600 versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 22,172 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 76%. The Arc A750 is built on Generation 12.7 while the GeForce RTX 3070 uses Ampere, both on 6 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Arc A750) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070). Raw compute: 17.2 TFLOPS (Arc A750) vs 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 1725 MHz. Ray tracing: 28 RT cores (Arc A750) vs 46 (GeForce RTX 3070) with 448 Tensor cores vs 184.
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,600 | 22,172+76% |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584 | 5888+64% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 17.2 TFLOPS | 20.31 TFLOPS+18% |
| Boost Clock | 2400 MHz+39% | 1725 MHz |
| ROPs | 112+17% | 96 |
| TMUs | 224+22% | 184 |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB+300% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 28 | 46+64% |
| Tensor Cores | 448+143% | 184 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 512 GB/s (Arc A750) vs 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3070) — a 14.3% advantage for the Arc A750. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 16 MB (Arc A750) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) — the Arc A750 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 512 GB/s+14% | 448 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB+300% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A750) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Dual Xe Media Engine (Arc A750) vs NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Arc A750) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070).
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Dual Xe Media Engine | NVENC 7th gen |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc A750 draws 225W versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 220W — a 2.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 3070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Arc A750) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 3070). Power connectors: 8-pin + 6-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 268mm vs 242mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 78°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 220W-2% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin + 6-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 268mm | 242mm |
| Height | — | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 78°C | 75°C-4% |
| Perf/Watt | 56.0 | 100.8+80% |
Value Analysis
The Arc A750 launched at $289 MSRP and currently averages $229, while the GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 and now averages $200. The GeForce RTX 3070 costs 12.7% less ($29 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 55.0 (Arc A750) vs 110.9 (GeForce RTX 3070) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 101.6% better value. The Arc A750 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2020).
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $289-42% | $499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $229 | $200-13% |
| Performance per Dollar | 55.0 | 110.9+102% |
| Codename | DG2-512 | GA104 |
| Release | October 12 2022 | September 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #212 | #63 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc A750 and GeForce RTX 3070
