Arc A750
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
Arc A750 vs GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Arc A750 vs GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Arc A750 vs GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Arc A750
2022Why buy it
- ✅27.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌26.2% HIGHER MSRP$289 MSRPvs$229 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 43.6 vs 55.4 G3D/$ ($289 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ❌80% higher power demand at 225W vs 125W.
- ❌17% longer card at 268mm vs 229mm.
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $60 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 27.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 55.4 vs 43.6 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 225W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 268mm, a 39mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Arc A750 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Arc A750 is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Arc A750 vs GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Arc A750
The Arc A750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2050 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,600 points. Launch price was $289.
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 29 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,692 points. Launch price was $229.
Graphics Performance
The Arc A750 scores 12,600 and the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER reaches 12,692 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A750 is built on Generation 12.7 while the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER uses Turing, both on 6 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Arc A750) vs 1,408 (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER). Raw compute: 17.2 TFLOPS (Arc A750) vs 5.027 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 1785 MHz.
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,600 | 12,692 |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Turing |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+155% | 1408 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 17.2 TFLOPS+242% | 5.027 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2400 MHz+34% | 1785 MHz |
| ROPs | 112+133% | 48 |
| TMUs | 224+155% | 88 |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB+967% | 1.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Arc A750 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc A750 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER carries 6 GB. Arc A750 gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 512 GB/s (Arc A750) vs 336 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) — a 52.4% advantage for the Arc A750. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Arc A750 and 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER. L2 Cache: 16 MB (Arc A750) vs 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) — the Arc A750 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+33% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 512 GB/s+52% | 336 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+33% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB+967% | 1.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A750) vs 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Dual Xe Media Engine (Arc A750) vs NVENC (Turing) (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs NVDEC (Turing). Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Arc A750) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER).
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Dual Xe Media Engine | NVENC (Turing) |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | NVDEC (Turing) |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc A750 draws 225W versus the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER's 125W — a 57.1% difference. The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Arc A750) vs 450W (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER). Power connectors: 8-pin + 6-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 268mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 78°C vs 75.
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 125W-44% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 450W-31% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin + 6-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 268mm | 229mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 78°C | 75-4% |
| Perf/Watt | 56.0 | 101.5+81% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Arc A750 came in at $289, while the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER launched at $229. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER was 20.8% cheaper ($60 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 43.6 (Arc A750) vs 55.4 (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) — the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER offers 27.1% better value. The newer card here is Arc A750 (2022 vs 2019).
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $289 | $229-21% |
| Performance per Dollar | 43.6 | 55.4+27% |
| Codename | DG2-512 | TU116 |
| Release | October 12 2022 | October 29 2019 |
| Ranking | #212 | #207 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc A750 and GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
