Arc A750 vs Radeon Pro 5700 XT
Arc A750
Popular choices:
Radeon Pro 5700 XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Arc A750
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro 5700 XT
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Arc A750 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon Pro 5700 XT offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Arc A750 | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.3%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) / 6nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) / 7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (268mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Arc A750 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $229 versus $280 for the Radeon Pro 5700 XT, it costs 18% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 23.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Arc A750 | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+23.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($229) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($280) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc A750 and Radeon Pro 5700 XT
Arc A750
The Arc A750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2050 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,600 points. Launch price was $289.
Radeon Pro 5700 XT
The Radeon Pro 5700 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1499 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,442 points.
Graphics Performance
The Arc A750 scores 12,600 and the Radeon Pro 5700 XT reaches 12,442 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A750 is built on Generation 12.7 while the Radeon Pro 5700 XT uses RDNA 1.0, both on 6 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Arc A750) vs 2,560 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Raw compute: 17.2 TFLOPS (Arc A750) vs 7.675 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 1499 MHz.
| Feature | Arc A750 | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,600+1% | 12,442 |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+40% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 17.2 TFLOPS+124% | 7.675 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2400 MHz+60% | 1499 MHz |
| ROPs | 112+75% | 64 |
| TMUs | 224+40% | 160 |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB+300% | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc A750 | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc A750 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 5700 XT has 16 GB. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 16 MB (Arc A750) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) — the Arc A750 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc A750 | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB+300% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A750) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | Arc A750 | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Dual Xe Media Engine (Arc A750) vs RDNA 1.0 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs Unified Video Decoder 7.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Arc A750) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT).
| Feature | Arc A750 | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Dual Xe Media Engine | RDNA 1.0 |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | Unified Video Decoder 7.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 | H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc A750 draws 225W versus the Radeon Pro 5700 XT's 130W — a 53.5% difference. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Arc A750) vs 500W (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Power connectors: 8-pin + 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 78°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Arc A750 | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 130W-42% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 500W-23% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin + 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 268mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 78°C | 75°C-4% |
| Perf/Watt | 56.0 | 95.7+71% |
Value Analysis
The Arc A750 launched at $289 MSRP and currently averages $229, while the Radeon Pro 5700 XT launched at $500 and now averages $280. The Arc A750 costs 18.2% less ($51 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 55.0 (Arc A750) vs 44.4 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) — the Arc A750 offers 23.9% better value. The Arc A750 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2020).
| Feature | Arc A750 | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $289-42% | $500 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $229-18% | $280 |
| Performance per Dollar | 55.0+24% | 44.4 |
| Codename | DG2-512 | Navi 10 |
| Release | October 12 2022 | August 4 2020 |
| Ranking | #212 | #215 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc A750 and Radeon Pro 5700 XT
