Arc A750
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Arc A750 vs GeForce RTX 3050 8GB Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Arc A750 vs GeForce RTX 3050 8GB FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Arc A750 vs GeForce RTX 3050 8GB: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Arc A750
2022Why buy it
- ✅21.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌16.1% HIGHER MSRP$289 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 43.6 vs 50.3 G3D/$ ($289 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌73.1% higher power demand at 225W vs 130W.
- ❌10.7% longer card at 268mm vs 242mm.
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $40 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 15.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.3 vs 43.6 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 225W, a 95W reduction.
- ✅Measures 242mm instead of 268mm, a 26mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Arc A750 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Arc A750 vs GeForce RTX 3050 8GB Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Arc A750
The Arc A750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2050 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,600 points. Launch price was $289.
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1552 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,535 points. Launch price was $249.
Graphics Performance
The Arc A750 scores 12,600 and the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB reaches 12,535 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A750 is built on Generation 12.7 while the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB uses Ampere, both on 6 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Arc A750) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Raw compute: 17.2 TFLOPS (Arc A750) vs 9.098 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 1777 MHz. Ray tracing: 28 RT cores (Arc A750) vs 20 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) with 448 Tensor cores vs 80.
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,600 | 12,535 |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+40% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 17.2 TFLOPS+89% | 9.098 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2400 MHz+35% | 1777 MHz |
| ROPs | 112+250% | 32 |
| TMUs | 224+180% | 80 |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB+700% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 28+40% | 20 |
| Tensor Cores | 448+460% | 80 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Arc A750 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 512 GB/s (Arc A750) vs 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) — a 128.6% advantage for the Arc A750. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Arc A750 and 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB. L2 Cache: 16 MB (Arc A750) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) — the Arc A750 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 512 GB/s+129% | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB+700% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A750) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Dual Xe Media Engine (Arc A750) vs NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Arc A750) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB).
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Dual Xe Media Engine | NVENC 7th gen |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc A750 draws 225W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB's 130W — a 53.5% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Arc A750) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Power connectors: 8-pin + 6-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 268mm vs 242mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 78°C vs 66°C.
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 130W-42% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 450W-31% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin + 6-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 268mm | 242mm |
| Height | — | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 78°C | 66°C-15% |
| Perf/Watt | 56.0 | 96.4+72% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Arc A750 came in at $289, while the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB launched at $249. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3050 8GB was 13.8% cheaper ($40 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 43.6 (Arc A750) vs 50.3 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers 15.4% better value.
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $289 | $249-14% |
| Performance per Dollar | 43.6 | 50.3+15% |
| Codename | DG2-512 | GA106 |
| Release | October 12 2022 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #212 | #211 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc A750 and GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
