CPU
GPU
Arc A750
Popular choices:
Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Arc A750
Performance Per Dollar Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (16 GB vs 8 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Arc A750.
| Insight | Arc A750 | Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) / 6nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Turing (2018−2022) / 12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (268mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc A750 and Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design
Arc A750
The Arc A750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2050 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,600 points. Launch price was $289.
Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design
The Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 600 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,675 points.
Graphics Performance
The Arc A750 scores 12,600 and the Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design reaches 12,675 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A750 is built on Generation 12.7 while the Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design uses Turing, both on 6 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Arc A750) vs 3,072 (Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design). Raw compute: 17.2 TFLOPS (Arc A750) vs 8.294 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 1350 MHz. Ray tracing: 28 RT cores (Arc A750) vs 48 (Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design) with 448 Tensor cores vs 384.
| Feature | Arc A750 | Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,600 | 12,675 |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Turing |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+17% | 3072 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 17.2 TFLOPS+107% | 8.294 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2400 MHz+78% | 1350 MHz |
| ROPs | 112+75% | 64 |
| TMUs | 224+17% | 192 |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB+300% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 28 | 48+71% |
| Tensor Cores | 448+17% | 384 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc A750 | Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc A750 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design has 16 GB. The Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 16 MB (Arc A750) vs 4 MB (Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design) — the Arc A750 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc A750 | Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB+300% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A750) vs 12.2 (Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc A750 | Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Dual Xe Media Engine (Arc A750) vs 7th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Arc A750) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design).
| Feature | Arc A750 | Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Dual Xe Media Engine | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc A750 draws 225W versus the Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design's 80W — a 95.1% difference. The Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Arc A750) vs 500W (Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design). Power connectors: 8-pin + 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 268mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 78°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Arc A750 | Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 80W-64% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 500W-23% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin + 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 268mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 78°C-3% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 56.0 | 158.4+183% |
Value Analysis
The Arc A750 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2019).
| Feature | Arc A750 | Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $289 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $229 | — |
| Codename | DG2-512 | TU104 |
| Release | October 12 2022 | May 27 2019 |
| Ranking | #212 | #208 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc A750 and Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design
