
GeForce GTX TITAN X vs GRID RTX6000-1Q

GeForce GTX TITAN X
Popular choices:

GRID RTX6000-1Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GRID RTX6000-1Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX TITAN X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (12 GB vs 8 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID RTX6000-1Q.
| Insight | GeForce GTX TITAN X | GRID RTX6000-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+50%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX TITAN X offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX TITAN X holds the technical lead. Priced at $120 (vs $1,500), it costs 92% less, resulting in a 1150.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX TITAN X | GRID RTX6000-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1150.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($120) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,500) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX TITAN X and GRID RTX6000-1Q

GeForce GTX TITAN X
The GeForce GTX TITAN X is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 17 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1075 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,621 points. Launch price was $999.

GRID RTX6000-1Q
The GRID RTX6000-1Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,617 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX TITAN X scores 12,621 and the GRID RTX6000-1Q reaches 12,617 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX TITAN X is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GRID RTX6000-1Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 2,048 (GRID RTX6000-1Q). Raw compute: 6.691 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID RTX6000-1Q). Boost clocks: 1075 MHz vs 1178 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | GRID RTX6000-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,621 | 12,617 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+50% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.691 TFLOPS+39% | 4.825 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1075 MHz | 1178 MHz+10% |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 192+50% | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 1.1 MB+47% | 0.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | GRID RTX6000-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX TITAN X comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the GRID RTX6000-1Q has 8 GB. The GeForce GTX TITAN X offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 384-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 2 MB (GRID RTX6000-1Q) — the GeForce GTX TITAN X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | GRID RTX6000-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+50% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+200% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL 12_1) (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 12.2 (GRID RTX6000-1Q). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | GRID RTX6000-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL 12_1) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 2nd gen (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 7th Gen NVENC (GRID RTX6000-1Q). Decoder: NVDEC 2nd gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GRID RTX6000-1Q).
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | GRID RTX6000-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 2nd gen | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC 2nd gen | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX TITAN X draws 250W versus the GRID RTX6000-1Q's 225W — a 10.5% difference. The GRID RTX6000-1Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 500W (GRID RTX6000-1Q). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 83°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | GRID RTX6000-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 225W-10% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 83°C-2% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 50.5 | 56.1+11% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX TITAN X launched at $999 MSRP and currently averages $120, while the GRID RTX6000-1Q launched at $6299 and now averages $1500. The GeForce GTX TITAN X costs 92% less ($1380 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 105.2 (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 8.4 (GRID RTX6000-1Q) — the GeForce GTX TITAN X offers 1152.4% better value.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | GRID RTX6000-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999-84% | $6299 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $120-92% | $1500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 105.2+1152% | 8.4 |
| Codename | GM200 | GM204 |
| Release | March 17 2015 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #209 | #525 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















