GeForce GTX TITAN X
Radeon Pro WX 8200
GeForce GTX TITAN X vs Radeon Pro WX 8200 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX TITAN X vs Radeon Pro WX 8200 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX TITAN X vs Radeon Pro WX 8200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX TITAN X
2015Why buy it
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro WX 8200 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2015 hardware with 12 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Radeon Pro WX 8200
2018Why buy it
- ✅5.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅GeForce GTX TITAN X is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Radeon Pro WX 8200 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX TITAN X vs Radeon Pro WX 8200 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce GTX TITAN X
The GeForce GTX TITAN X is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 17 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1075 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,621 points. Launch price was $999.
Radeon Pro WX 8200
The Radeon Pro WX 8200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,615 points. Launch price was $999.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX TITAN X scores 12,621 and the Radeon Pro WX 8200 reaches 12,615 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX TITAN X is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon Pro WX 8200 uses GCN 5.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 3,584 (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Raw compute: 6.691 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 10.75 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Boost clocks: 1075 MHz vs 1500 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,621 | 12,615 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072 | 3584+17% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.691 TFLOPS | 10.75 TFLOPS+61% |
| Boost Clock | 1075 MHz | 1500 MHz+40% |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 192 | 224+17% |
| L1 Cache | 1.1 MB+25% | 0.88 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX TITAN X gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro WX 8200 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX TITAN X has 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 8200 carries 8 GB. GeForce GTX TITAN X gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the GeForce GTX TITAN X and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro WX 8200. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro WX 8200) — the Radeon Pro WX 8200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+50% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+200% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL 12_1) (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL 12_1) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 2nd gen (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Decoder: NVDEC 2nd gen vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro WX 8200).
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 2nd gen | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 2nd gen | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX TITAN X draws 250W versus the Radeon Pro WX 8200's 230W — a 8.3% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 8200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 500W (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 83°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 230W-8% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 83°C | 80°C-4% |
| Perf/Watt | 50.5 | 54.8+9% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX TITAN X came in at $999, while the Radeon Pro WX 8200 launched at $999. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.6 (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 12.6 (Radeon Pro WX 8200) — the Radeon Pro WX 8200 offers 0% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro WX 8200 (2018 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999 | $999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.6 | 12.6 |
| Codename | GM200 | Vega 10 |
| Release | March 17 2015 | August 13 2018 |
| Ranking | #209 | #210 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX TITAN X and Radeon Pro WX 8200
