G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs GeForce GTX TITAN X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs GeForce GTX TITAN X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $770 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 338.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 55.4 vs 12.6 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Better long-term bet: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 125W instead of 250W, a 125W reduction.
✅Measures 229mm instead of 267mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX TITAN X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

GeForce GTX TITAN X

2015

Why buy it

✅8.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 6 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 12 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌
336.2% HIGHER MSRP
$999 MSRPvs$229 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.6 vs 55.4 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
❌100% higher power demand at 250W vs 125W.
❌16.6% longer card at 267mm vs 229mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX TITAN X is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 8.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER instead at 12,692 vs 12,621, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2015. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER makes the most sense to buy today. It is $770 cheaper on MSRP at $229 vs $999, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 338.7% (55.4 vs 12.6), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. GeForce GTX TITAN X still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs GeForce GTX TITAN X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 29 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,692 points. Launch price was $229.

GeForce GTX TITAN X

The GeForce GTX TITAN X is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 17 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1075 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,621 points. Launch price was $999.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER scores 12,692 and the GeForce GTX TITAN X reaches 12,621 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is built on Turing while the GeForce GTX TITAN X uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs 3,072 (GeForce GTX TITAN X). Raw compute: 5.027 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs 6.691 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX TITAN X). Boost clocks: 1785 MHz vs 1075 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER	GeForce GTX TITAN X
G3D Mark Score	12,692	12,621
Architecture	Turing	Maxwell 2.0
Process Node	12 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1408	3072+118%
Compute (TFLOPS)	5.027 TFLOPS	6.691 TFLOPS+33%
Boost Clock	1785 MHz+66%	1075 MHz
ROPs	48	96+100%
TMUs	88	192+118%
L1 Cache	1.4 MB+27%	1.1 MB
L2 Cache	1.5 MB	3 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER	GeForce GTX TITAN X
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER has 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX TITAN X carries 12 GB. GeForce GTX TITAN X gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER and 384-bit on the GeForce GTX TITAN X. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs 3 MB (GeForce GTX TITAN X) — the GeForce GTX TITAN X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER	GeForce GTX TITAN X
VRAM Capacity	6 GB	12 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	336 GB/s	336 GB/s
Bus Width	192-bit	384-bit+100%
L2 Cache	1.5 MB	3 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs 12 (FL 12_1) (GeForce GTX TITAN X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER	GeForce GTX TITAN X
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (FL 12_1)
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6+2%	4.5
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs NVENC 2nd gen (GeForce GTX TITAN X). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs NVDEC 2nd gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX TITAN X).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER	GeForce GTX TITAN X
Encoder	NVENC (Turing)	NVENC 2nd gen
Decoder	NVDEC (Turing)	NVDEC 2nd gen
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1	H.264,H.265/HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER draws 125W versus the GeForce GTX TITAN X's 250W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs 600W (GeForce GTX TITAN X). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 83°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER	GeForce GTX TITAN X
TDP	125W-50%	250W
Recommended PSU	450W-25%	600W
Power Connector	8-pin	6-pin + 8-pin
Length	229mm	267mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	75-10%	83°C
Perf/Watt	101.5+101%	50.5

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER came in at $229, while the GeForce GTX TITAN X launched at $999. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER was 77.1% cheaper ($770 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 55.4 (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs 12.6 (GeForce GTX TITAN X) — the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER offers 339.7% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER (2019 vs 2015).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER	GeForce GTX TITAN X
MSRP	$229-77%	$999
Performance per Dollar	55.4+340%	12.6
Codename	TU116	GM200
Release	October 29 2019	March 17 2015
Ranking	#207	#209

Search GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER on Amazon

Search GeForce GTX TITAN X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.