
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.4%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (6 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (6 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $85 versus $110 for the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER, it costs 23% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 30% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+30%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($110) | ✅More affordable ($85) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER and GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 29 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,692 points. Launch price was $229.

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,747 points. Launch price was $279.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER scores 12,692 and the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti reaches 12,747 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is built on Turing while the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 1,408 (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs 1,536 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti). Raw compute: 5.027 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs 5.437 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti). Boost clocks: 1785 MHz vs 1770 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,692 | 12,747 |
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 1408 | 1536+9% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.027 TFLOPS | 5.437 TFLOPS+8% |
| Boost Clock | 1785 MHz | 1770 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 48 |
| TMUs | 88 | 96+9% |
| L1 Cache | 1.4 MB | 1.5 MB+7% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 1.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 6 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs 288 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) — a 16.7% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER. Bus width: 192-bit vs 192-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s+17% | 288 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 1.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs NVENC 7th gen (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | NVENC 7th gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) | NVDEC 4th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER draws 125W versus the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti's 120W — a 4.1% difference. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs 450W (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 125W | 120W-4% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 450W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 229mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 101.5 | 106.2+5% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER launched at $229 MSRP and currently averages $110, while the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti launched at $279 and now averages $85. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti costs 22.7% less ($25 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 115.4 (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs 150.0 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti offers 30% better value.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $229-18% | $279 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $110 | $85-23% |
| Performance per Dollar | 115.4 | 150.0+30% |
| Codename | TU116 | TU116 |
| Release | October 29 2019 | February 22 2019 |
| Ranking | #207 | #204 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















