GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
2019Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 55.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 158W, a 33W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 267mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 28 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
2018Why buy it
- ✅23.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅366.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (28 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 28 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 55.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ❌26.4% higher power demand at 158W vs 125W.
- ❌16.6% longer card at 267mm vs 229mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 29 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,692 points. Launch price was $229.
Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 26 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 158W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,130 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER scores 12,692 and the Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU reaches 13,130 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is built on Turing while the Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU uses GCN 5.0, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs 3,584 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU). Raw compute: 5.027 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU). Boost clocks: 1785 MHz vs 1500 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,692 | 13,130+3% |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1408 | 3584 ×2+155% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.027 TFLOPS | 10.75 TFLOPS ×2+114% |
| Boost Clock | 1785 MHz+19% | 1500 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64 ×2+33% |
| TMUs | 88 | 224 ×2+155% |
| L1 Cache | 1.4 MB+59% | 0.88 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 4 MB+167% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU carries 28 GB. Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU gives you 366.7% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER and 256-bit on the Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs 4 MB (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU) — the Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 28 GB+367% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 4 MB+167% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER draws 125W versus the Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU's 158W — a 23.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs 500W (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 125W-21% | 158W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-10% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 101.5+22% | 83.1 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER (2019 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $229 | — |
| Codename | TU116 | Vega 10 |
| Release | October 29 2019 | August 26 2018 |
| Ranking | #207 | #592 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER and Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
