GeForce GTX TITAN X vs Radeon RX 5700M
GeForce GTX TITAN X
Popular choices:
Radeon RX 5700M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 5700M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX 5700M uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon RX 5700M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX TITAN X lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 5700M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX TITAN X offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GTX TITAN X | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) / 7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+50%) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon RX 5700M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX TITAN X and Radeon RX 5700M
GeForce GTX TITAN X
The GeForce GTX TITAN X is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 17 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1075 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,621 points. Launch price was $999.
Radeon RX 5700M
The Radeon RX 5700M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1465 MHz to 1720 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,669 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX TITAN X scores 12,621 and the Radeon RX 5700M reaches 12,669 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX TITAN X is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon RX 5700M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 5700M). Raw compute: 6.691 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 7.926 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5700M). Boost clocks: 1075 MHz vs 1720 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,621 | 12,669 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+33% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.691 TFLOPS | 7.926 TFLOPS+18% |
| Boost Clock | 1075 MHz | 1720 MHz+60% |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 192+33% | 144 |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 8 MB+167% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 2.1 |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX TITAN X comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 5700M has 8 GB. The GeForce GTX TITAN X offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 384 GB/s (Radeon RX 5700M) — a 14.3% advantage for the Radeon RX 5700M. Bus width: 384-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 8 MB (Radeon RX 5700M) — the Radeon RX 5700M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+50% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s | 384 GB/s+14% |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+50% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 8 MB+167% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL 12_1) (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 12.1 (Radeon RX 5700M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL 12_1) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 2nd gen (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5700M). Decoder: NVDEC 2nd gen vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5700M).
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 2nd gen | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 2nd gen | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX TITAN X draws 250W versus the Radeon RX 5700M's 180W — a 32.6% difference. The Radeon RX 5700M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 500W (Radeon RX 5700M). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 83°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 180W-28% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 83°C-2% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 50.5 | 70.4+39% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 5700M is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $120 | — |
| Codename | GM200 | Navi 10 |
| Release | March 17 2015 | March 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #209 | #751 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX TITAN X and Radeon RX 5700M
